Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 26 at 22:09 comment added darij grinberg @hans: Thank you! Still only for positive-definite forms, as I feared, but good to have nevertheless.
Nov 26 at 20:41 comment added hans @darijgrinberg doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/quadratic_forms/sage/…
Nov 25 at 19:13 comment added darij grinberg @hans: Can Sage really check lattices for isometry? I don't see this option.
Jan 27, 2021 at 15:21 comment added en kuo @TylerLawson, no worries. I have another question, I can only find the algorithm of sage (or Magma) which can compute the automorphism group of definite form. Is there a way that at least we can compute some X for a given K (when K is an indefinite form)?
Jan 16, 2021 at 17:19 comment added Tyler Lawson My apologies, I obviously made a mistake in the calculation.
Jan 16, 2021 at 12:24 answer added hans timeline score: 3
Jan 16, 2021 at 2:10 comment added en kuo @TylerLawson, but I have used the sage. It seams like they are isomorphic over Q. But I am not sure it is isomorphic over Z. Let me check the invariant of what you mentioned.
Jan 15, 2021 at 18:34 comment added Tyler Lawson A back-of-the-envelope calculation seems to indicate these two forms have different 3-adic Hasse-Witt invariants, which would mean that they are not isomorphic over $\Bbb Q$.
Jan 15, 2021 at 17:28 comment added en kuo But I found that "is_rationally_isometric" function only works for number field but not integers
Jan 15, 2021 at 16:57 comment added en kuo @hans, I have checked this quadratic form. I think this is what I want.
Jan 15, 2021 at 12:00 comment added en kuo @hans, thanks, I will check them.
Jan 15, 2021 at 11:43 comment added hans You just want to check if two define lattices are properly isometric. Any modern computer algebra system can do this, e.g. Sage or Magma.
Jan 15, 2021 at 11:03 history asked en kuo CC BY-SA 4.0