Timeline for Example of a sub-bialgebra of a Hopf algebra that is not a Hopf subalgebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2021 at 16:19 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | Sorry, I mistook your tone of voice. I think you were being perfectly polite. I also have, I'm sure, left comments on MO that I had meant without complaint or criticism, but that could be read that way depending on the reader's mindset. I should have just written "yes, absolutely, thank you for pointing it out" or something along those lines. | |
| Jan 15, 2021 at 16:30 | comment | added | LSpice | I wasn't complaining or criticising, just trying to reflect the answer and comment history. If you know a more polite way to post such informational comments, then I would be happy to do it. | |
| Jan 15, 2021 at 14:22 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @LSpice Yes, absolutely. Jim could have posted an answer, and I suspect it would have been accepted (although I cannot speak for OP). I'm a little tired of writing comments of the form "Dear so and so, your comment answers the question, please post it as an answer". Questions that are not "answered" get occasionally bumped to the top of the homepage by the MO daemon, and also writing an "answer" allows for a little more explanation/education. | |
| Jan 14, 2021 at 18:41 | vote | accept | Jake Wetlock | ||
| Jan 14, 2021 at 18:36 | vote | accept | Jake Wetlock | ||
| Jan 14, 2021 at 18:41 | |||||
| Jan 14, 2021 at 17:23 | comment | added | LSpice | Related to @Jim's comment. | |
| Jan 14, 2021 at 16:57 | history | answered | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |