Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 6, 2021 at 22:17 vote accept M. Winter
Jan 6, 2021 at 11:22 answer added M. Winter timeline score: 0
Jan 5, 2021 at 10:30 comment added M. Winter @dodd For an arbitrary subspace there is no meaning in "an edge $ij\in E$". But you could consider the smallest eigenvalue (that is, the corresponding eigenspace) of the 5-cycle graph. Then the $u_i$ exist for all vertices, but $u_{ij}$ exists for no edge.
Jan 5, 2021 at 2:38 comment added M. Winter @dodd This subspace is not just any subspace, but it is a very special eigenspace of an irreducible symmetric 01-matrix, and I ask for the existence of $u_{ij}$ only if the $(i,j)$-entry of that matrix is one. I consider the formulation in terms of graphs more natural than just talking about this matrix (and I do not see how this can be reasonably formulated just in terms of subspaces). Of course, I am happy with an answer in any language, whether graphs, matrices, subspaces, etc.
Jan 5, 2021 at 2:18 comment added M. Winter @dodd I restricted the question to connected graphs now.
Jan 5, 2021 at 2:18 history edited M. Winter CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body
Jan 5, 2021 at 2:16 comment added markvs Try the graph with two vertices and no edges. It has one eigenvalue of multiplicity 2.
Jan 5, 2021 at 2:02 comment added M. Winter @dodd Correct me if I am wrong, but I think this follows from the Theorem of Perron-Frobenius, at least for connected graphs. If it makes a difference, I should restrict my question to connected graphs, but I do not think so.
Jan 4, 2021 at 22:02 history edited M. Winter CC BY-SA 4.0
added 31 characters in body
Jan 4, 2021 at 21:57 history asked M. Winter CC BY-SA 4.0