Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 4, 2021 at 13:56 comment added Chris Heunen See Lemma 4.11 and further in global.oup.com/academic/product/…
Jan 3, 2021 at 20:50 comment added Maxime Ramzi $X\otimes X^*$ is also known as the internal hom of $X$; and you can prove more generally that $\hom(Y,Z)\otimes \hom(X,Y)\to \hom(X,Z)$ is "associative" in a monoidal closed category - this has appeared somewhere on MO or MSE - more specifically here : mathoverflow.net/questions/21382/… (you then need to compare your map on $X^*\otimes X$ to the one on $\hom(X,X)$)
Jan 3, 2021 at 20:45 comment added Qiaochu Yuan Yes, it's correct. Associativity is easiest to prove using string diagrams; a bicategorical version of this argument shows that an adjunction gives rise to a monad (and in particular you don't need an assumption about left vs. right duals). The monoid structure you get this way is an enriched endomorphism object of $X$ with respect to a (partial) enrichment of $M$ over itself, generalizing the familiar case of $\text{FinVect}$.
Jan 3, 2021 at 20:09 history edited Jake Wetlock CC BY-SA 4.0
added 57 characters in body
Jan 3, 2021 at 19:55 history asked Jake Wetlock CC BY-SA 4.0