Timeline for Can one reuse positive referee reports if paper ends up being rejected?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2020 at 18:24 | comment | added | Dirk Werner | It seems to me that ticking that box would just cascade the paper down within the same publishing house, but not elsewhere, e.g., not from Springer Journal A to Cambridge Univ. Press Journal B. The author may have had different ideas where the paper should end up. | |
| Dec 29, 2020 at 21:30 | vote | accept | Hercule Poirot | ||
| Dec 29, 2020 at 16:19 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Dec 29, 2020 at 14:12 | comment | added | Martin Argerami | I wonder how widespread this practice is. I have refereed a fair number of papers (even including re-submissions to a second journal where I was the referee in both cases) and I don't think I was ever asked that question. | |
| Dec 29, 2020 at 2:22 | comment | added | Deane Yang | I am routinely asked to check this box, and I always do. So the practice seems to have spread pretty widely. | |
| Dec 28, 2020 at 21:49 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |