Timeline for Local complexity of triangulations
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2, 2022 at 21:51 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | @skupers: No.... | |
May 2, 2022 at 19:09 | comment | added | skupers | @MoisheKohan Have the details of this argument appeared anywhere since? | |
Dec 27, 2020 at 19:40 | comment | added | Fedya | @SamNead -- it's a cool question, and I don't know the answer. It's also distinct from the concordance question, which may be distinct, cf. arxiv.org/abs/1910.10914 in the case of 3-manifolds. In this case you can just take a sufficiently nice sequence of triangulations of the simplex where you know a priori how to fill in the cylinder. | |
Dec 27, 2020 at 13:23 | comment | added | Sam Nead | @Fedya - In thinking about your answer, I was driven to ask the following question: mathoverflow.net/questions/379771/… | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 18:39 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
Dec 26, 2020 at 18:28 | comment | added | Fedya | I just made the argument somewhat more explicit, hope this helps. | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 18:28 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
made some parts of the argument more explicit
|
Dec 25, 2020 at 12:11 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | Thank you, I will try to fill in the details. | |
Dec 25, 2020 at 3:16 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
some clarifications/corrections
|
Dec 24, 2020 at 20:04 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
better explanation of what's rigorous and what's not
|
Dec 24, 2020 at 19:46 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
wrote down explicit constants
|
Dec 24, 2020 at 18:11 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor correction
|
Dec 24, 2020 at 18:00 | history | edited | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
slight corrections
|
Dec 24, 2020 at 17:35 | history | answered | Fedya | CC BY-SA 4.0 |