Skip to main content
fixed grammar.
Source Link

So math stack exchange isn't really helping much with this. So initially, I'm proving the inverse laplace transform using contour integration. This is a good starting point for my research when I eventually need to find the inverse laplace transform when the functions could not be found in tables. I need to prove that: $$\DeclareMathOperator{\erfc}{erfc} \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = \erfc\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$ This inverse laplace transform can be found using a table of Laplace Transforms. Using the following contour:

Source: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/269684/hankel-bromwich-contour-problem

Then, after considering all contributions of this contour to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-ut) \sin(\sqrt{u/k} x) \frac{du}{u} $$ Here, we can simplify the integral by letting: $v^{2} = ut$ and $y = x/\sqrt{kt}$ to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{2}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-v) \sin(yv) \frac{dv}{v}. $$ How do I continue from here to eventually get to : $$ 1 - \erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - \erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$$$ 1 - erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$

So math stack exchange isn't really helping much with this. So initially, I'm proving the inverse laplace transform using contour integration. This is a good starting point for my research when I eventually need to find the inverse laplace transform when the functions could not be found in tables. I need to prove that: $$\DeclareMathOperator{\erfc}{erfc} \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = \erfc\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$ This inverse laplace transform can be found using a table of Laplace Transforms. Using the following contour:

Source: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/269684/hankel-bromwich-contour-problem

Then, after considering all contributions of this contour to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-ut) \sin(\sqrt{u/k} x) \frac{du}{u} $$ Here, we can simplify the integral by letting: $v^{2} = ut$ and $y = x/\sqrt{kt}$ to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{2}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-v) \sin(yv) \frac{dv}{v}. $$ How do I continue from here to eventually get to : $$ 1 - \erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - \erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$

So math stack exchange isn't really helping much with this. So initially, I'm proving the inverse laplace transform using contour integration. This is a good starting point for my research when I eventually need to find the inverse laplace transform when the functions could not be found in tables. I need to prove that: $$\DeclareMathOperator{\erfc}{erfc} \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = \erfc\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$ This inverse laplace transform can be found using a table of Laplace Transforms. Using the following contour:

Source: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/269684/hankel-bromwich-contour-problem

Then, after considering all contributions of this contour to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-ut) \sin(\sqrt{u/k} x) \frac{du}{u} $$ Here, we can simplify the integral by letting: $v^{2} = ut$ and $y = x/\sqrt{kt}$ to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{2}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-v) \sin(yv) \frac{dv}{v}. $$ How do I continue from here to eventually get to : $$ 1 - erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$

So math stack exchange isn't really helping much with this. So initially, imI'm proving the inverse laplace transform using contour integration. This is a good starting point for my research when I eventually need to find the inverse laplace transform when the functions could not be not be found in tables. I need to prove that: $$\DeclareMathOperator{\erfc}{erfc} \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = \erfc\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$ This inverse laplace transform can be found using a table of Laplace TransformTransforms. Using the following contour:

Source: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/269684/hankel-bromwich-contour-problem

Then, after considering all contributions of this contour to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-ut) \sin(\sqrt{u/k} x) \frac{du}{u} $$ Here, we can simplify the integral by letting: $v^{2} = ut$ and $y = x/\sqrt{kt}$ to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{2}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-v) \sin(yv) \frac{dv}{v}. $$ How do I continue from here to eventually get to : $$ 1 - \erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - \erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$

So math stack exchange isn't really helping much with this. So initially, im proving the inverse laplace transform using contour integration. This is a good starting point for my research when I eventually need to find the inverse laplace transform when the functions could not be not be found in tables. I need to prove that: $$\DeclareMathOperator{\erfc}{erfc} \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = \erfc\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$ This inverse laplace transform can be found using a table of Laplace Transform. Using the following contour:

Source: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/269684/hankel-bromwich-contour-problem

Then, after considering all contributions of this contour to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-ut) \sin(\sqrt{u/k} x) \frac{du}{u} $$ Here, we can simplify the integral by letting: $v^{2} = ut$ and $y = x/\sqrt{kt}$ to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{2}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-v) \sin(yv) \frac{dv}{v}. $$ How do I continue from here to eventually get to : $$ 1 - \erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - \erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$

So math stack exchange isn't really helping much with this. So initially, I'm proving the inverse laplace transform using contour integration. This is a good starting point for my research when I eventually need to find the inverse laplace transform when the functions could not be found in tables. I need to prove that: $$\DeclareMathOperator{\erfc}{erfc} \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = \erfc\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$ This inverse laplace transform can be found using a table of Laplace Transforms. Using the following contour:

Source: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/269684/hankel-bromwich-contour-problem

Then, after considering all contributions of this contour to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-ut) \sin(\sqrt{u/k} x) \frac{du}{u} $$ Here, we can simplify the integral by letting: $v^{2} = ut$ and $y = x/\sqrt{kt}$ to get: $$ \mathscr{L}^{-1} \bigg[ \frac{1}{s}\big(\exp (- \sqrt{s/k}x)\big) \bigg] = 1 - \frac{2}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} \exp(-v) \sin(yv) \frac{dv}{v}. $$ How do I continue from here to eventually get to : $$ 1 - \erf\left(\frac{y}{2}\right) = 1 - \erf\left(\frac{x}{2\sqrt{kt}}\right) $$

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
edited title
Source Link
Loading
added 88 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Minor Math Jaxing
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45
Loading
edited body
Source Link
Loading
added 30 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading