Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 21, 2020 at 20:21 comment added Yemon Choi It is worth noting that while I agree with @ChristianRemling's observation that what you have defined can be viewed as a vector-valued $L^\infty$-space, the result will not be a Hilbert space, and it will lose all the important connections between e.g. harmonicity/holomorphicity and the Hardy space. Note that if $g$ belongs to this larger space there is no reason to suppose its behaviour on the circle of radius $1/2$ in any way controls what happens inside that circle, and $g$ need not have any kind of power-series expansion
Dec 21, 2020 at 15:48 comment added Christian Remling @MCS: No, sorry, I don't know of a reference that discusses this topic in detail. The proof of the completeness of $L^{\infty}((0,1); X)$, $X$ a Banach space, should be essentially the same as in the classical case $X=\mathbb C$ (if $f_n$ is a Cauchy sequence, then $f_n(x)$ is a Cauchy sequence in $X$ for all $x\in (0,1)\setminus N$, $|N|=0$, so the pointwise limit $f(x)=\lim f_n(x)$ exists, and then show that $f_n\to f$ in norm).
Dec 21, 2020 at 1:36 comment added MCS Wonderful! Is there a name or any keywords associated to Banach spaces whose elements are Banach-space-valued functions of a real variable? That is, what should I search for to find information about this sort of thing? (For example: a proof that this is a Banach space?)
Dec 20, 2020 at 23:49 comment added Christian Remling I think you can tie this up with mainstream theory by viewing $g$ as a function $g: (0,1)\to L^2(S)$, and now of course $g(r)$ is the restriction of your $g$ to the circle $re^{i\varphi}$. So I think the usual notation for your space would be $L^{\infty}((0,1); L^2(S))$ (and yes, this is a Banach space).
Dec 20, 2020 at 1:40 comment added Yemon Choi Thanks. Upon re-reading, perhaps I was a little hasty with my second comment; there is a notion of "harmonic Hardy space" which is by definition a space of real-valued harmonic functions on the disk satisfying the growth condition that you refer to as the space-defining norm. I think what is going on here is that "(1-|z|) times holomorphic" is still much more special than just continuous
Dec 20, 2020 at 1:25 comment added MCS Thank you for this comment. I have changed the title, as per your suggestion. Your comment is in part exactly why I asked this question. Now I know that what I'm working with doesn't fall under the provenance of classical Hardy Space theory.
Dec 20, 2020 at 1:24 history edited MCS CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Dec 20, 2020 at 0:50 comment added Yemon Choi In particular, "the space-defining norm" is not the characteristic feature of Hardy spaces; the holomorphic structure (and the ensuing boundary behaviour as $r\nearrow 1$) is the crucial factor.
Dec 20, 2020 at 0:48 comment added Yemon Choi Would you mind editing your title? Hardy spaces on the disk have established definitions, and if you want to consider larger spaces then you really really really really should not talk about "atypical elements of Hardy spaces"
Dec 19, 2020 at 23:17 history asked MCS CC BY-SA 4.0