Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Liviu Nicolaescu
  • 34.7k
  • 2
  • 91
  • 165

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G+p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M \big(\; -p_1(\Ad(P))+(\dim G)\rho_D\;\big) $$$$\ind L= \int_M \big(\; p_1(\Ad(P))+(\dim G)\rho_D\;\big) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$$$ \ind L=\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= \int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M \big(\; -p_1(\Ad(P))+(\dim G)\rho_D\;\big) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G+p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M \big(\; p_1(\Ad(P))+(\dim G)\rho_D\;\big) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= \int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

added 15 characters in body
Source Link
Liviu Nicolaescu
  • 34.7k
  • 2
  • 91
  • 165

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M (-p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\rho_D) $$$$\ind L= \int_M \big(\; -p_1(\Ad(P))+(\dim G)\rho_D\;\big) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M (-p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\rho_D) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M \big(\; -p_1(\Ad(P))+(\dim G)\rho_D\;\big) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Liviu Nicolaescu
  • 34.7k
  • 2
  • 91
  • 165

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$$D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad)+\cdots, $$$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M (-p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\rho_D) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]-4$$\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearinnfgappearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad)+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M (-p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\rho_D) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]-4$ is the index density of $D$ appearinnfg in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

Hopefully I remember this well. My adviser explained this computation to me I don't even want to think how many years ago.

The deformation complex of the SD equation is $\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}$

$$L=d_A^-\oplus d_A^*:\Omega^1\big(\, \Ad(P)\,\big)\to\Omega^2_-\big(\; \Ad(P)\;\big)\oplus \Omega^0\big(\;\Ad(P)\;\big). $$

The dimension of the moduli space of self-dual connections is the index of this operator. $\DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\ch}{ch}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{\hA}{\widehat{A}}$This operator is obtained by twisting with $\Ad(P)$ the operator

$$ D=d^-+d^*:\Omega^1(M)\to \Omega^2_-(M)\oplus \Omega^0(M) $$

This is the operator $D: \Gamma(V_+\oplus V_-)\to \Gamma(V_-\oplus V_-)$ in the paper you mentioned.

The Atiyah-Singer index theory shows that $\ind L$ is

$$\ind L= \int_M \big[\; \ch(\Ad(P)) \hA(X)\ch(V_-)\;\big]_4, $$

where $[--]_4$ denotes the degree $4$ part of a non-homogeneous differential form.

We deduce

$$\ch(\Ad(P))=\dim G +\ch_2(\Ad(P))+\cdots = \dim G-p_1(\Ad(P))+\cdots, $$

$$\ind L= \int_M (-p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\rho_D) $$

where the degree $4$ from $\rho_D= [\hA(X)\ch(V_-)]_4$ is the index density of $D$ appearing in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem $$ \ind D=\int_M \rho_D. $$

Thus

$$ \ind L=-\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G\ind D= -\int_M p_1(\Ad(P))+\dim G(b_1 -b_2^--b_0). $$

Now express $(b_1-b_2^--b_0)$ in terms of the signature $\tau=b_2^+-b_2^-$ and the Euler characteristic $\chi=2b_0-2b_1+b_2^++b_2^-$.

edited body
Source Link
Liviu Nicolaescu
  • 34.7k
  • 2
  • 91
  • 165
Loading
Source Link
Liviu Nicolaescu
  • 34.7k
  • 2
  • 91
  • 165
Loading