Skip to main content
added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Daniel Loughran
  • 21.4k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 136

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical bundle $\omega$$\omega_X$ of an Enriques surface $X$ satisfies $\omega \otimes \omega=0$$\omega_X \otimes \omega_X=\mathcal{O}_X$, but $\omega\neq 0$$\omega_X\neq \mathcal{O}_X$ in the Picard group. It follows that $\omega$$\omega_X$ is not the restriction of any line bundle in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these can't be non-zero torsion.

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical bundle $\omega$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $\omega \otimes \omega=0$, but $\omega\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $\omega$ is not the restriction of any line bundle in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these can't be non-zero torsion.

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical bundle $\omega_X$ of an Enriques surface $X$ satisfies $\omega_X \otimes \omega_X=\mathcal{O}_X$, but $\omega_X\neq \mathcal{O}_X$ in the Picard group. It follows that $\omega_X$ is not the restriction of any line bundle in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these can't be non-zero torsion.

added 21 characters in body; added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Daniel Loughran
  • 21.4k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 136

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical divisorbundle $K$$\omega$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $2K=0$$\omega \otimes \omega=0$, but $K\neq 0$$\omega\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $K$$\omega$ is not the restriction of any divisorline bundle in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these are necessarily notcan't be non-zero torsion.

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical divisor $K$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $2K=0$, but $K\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $K$ is not the restriction of any divisor in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these are necessarily not torsion.

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical bundle $\omega$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $\omega \otimes \omega=0$, but $\omega\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $\omega$ is not the restriction of any line bundle in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these can't be non-zero torsion.

deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
Daniel Loughran
  • 21.4k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 136

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical divisor $K$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $2K=0$, but $K\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $K$ is not the restriction of any divisor in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these are neccessarilynecessarily not torsion.

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical divisor $K$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $2K=0$, but $K\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $K$ is not the restriction of any divisor in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these are neccessarily not torsion.

Im not sure if this counts as a full answer, but it is a nice example which will hopefully shed light on some of your questions.

The canonical divisor $K$ of an Enriques surface satisfies $2K=0$, but $K\neq 0$ in the Picard group. It follows that $K$ is not the restriction of any divisor in $\mathbb{P}^n$, as these are necessarily not torsion.

Source Link
Daniel Loughran
  • 21.4k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 136
Loading