Timeline for Forms of ${\rm SL}(2)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 7, 2020 at 9:31 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
Dec 6, 2020 at 16:50 | comment | added | Mikhail Borovoi | @YCor: Yes, $k$-forms of ${\rm SL}_2$ $\leftrightarrow$ (quaternion algebras over $k$) holds for arbitrary fields. See Serre, Galois Cohomology, Section III.1.4. | |
Dec 6, 2020 at 16:32 | comment | added | Mikhail Borovoi | Excellent! Thank you! | |
Dec 6, 2020 at 16:30 | vote | accept | Mikhail Borovoi | ||
Dec 6, 2020 at 15:26 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Various \DeclareMathOperator's
|
Dec 6, 2020 at 13:23 | comment | added | YCor | What are restrictions on $k$ to make the Galois cohomology argument work? It works for $k$ perfect, and probably in more cases here? I guess that the result itself (at least: $k$-forms of $\mathrm{SL}_2\leftrightarrow$ (quaternion algebras over $k$) holds for arbitrary fields? | |
Dec 6, 2020 at 13:17 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 6, 2020 at 13:17 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Aargh, of course you are correct, for $n > 2$ there is a quasi-split outer form. I will edit to make the statement for $n = 2$ only. | |
Dec 6, 2020 at 13:06 | comment | added | Jef | Small unimportant correction: it is not true that the root datum of $SL_n$ has no non-trivial automorphisms if $n>2$: in that case the Dynkin diagram has a unique nontrivial involution as a symmetry. | |
Dec 6, 2020 at 10:53 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 376 characters in body
|
Dec 6, 2020 at 10:26 | history | answered | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |