Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 28, 2020 at 14:58 comment added Dmitriy Shekhmatov Thank you! Function really has problem when $x = 0$
Nov 28, 2020 at 14:55 vote accept Dmitriy Shekhmatov
Nov 28, 2020 at 12:39 comment added Pietro Majer After all $(\mathbb{R}_+,\cdot)$ is isomorphic as a topological group to $(\mathbb{R},+)$. So, up to notation, the question is whether there exist nonconstant, continuous, $2$-periodic functions: yes on $\mathbb{R}$, no if one also wants a limit at $-\infty$, that is at $0$ in the multiplicative formulation.
Nov 28, 2020 at 7:33 history closed Nate Eldredge
LSpice
Piotr Hajlasz
abx
GH from MO
Not suitable for this site
Nov 28, 2020 at 6:48 answer added Wlod AA timeline score: 1
Nov 28, 2020 at 6:25 answer added Thomas Browning timeline score: 4
Nov 28, 2020 at 4:42 review Close votes
Nov 28, 2020 at 7:35
Nov 28, 2020 at 4:41 comment added LSpice What is the value of your function at $x = 0$?
Nov 28, 2020 at 4:17 comment added Thomas Browning Suppose that $f\colon\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is continuous and satisfies $f(x)=f(2x)$. Let $\varepsilon>0$ and pick $\delta>0$ such that $\lvert f(x)-f(0)\rvert<\varepsilon$ for all $\lvert x\rvert<\delta$. Then for each $x\in\mathbb{R}$, $\lvert f(x)-f(0)\rvert=\lvert f(x/2^k)-f(0)\rvert<\varepsilon$ (where $k$ is chosen large enough so that $\lvert x/2^k\rvert<\delta$). Since this holds for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$ and all $\varepsilon>0$, this forces $f(x)=f(0)$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$.
Nov 28, 2020 at 4:03 review First posts
Nov 28, 2020 at 5:38
Nov 28, 2020 at 4:01 history asked Dmitriy Shekhmatov CC BY-SA 4.0