Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 23, 2020 at 7:40 history edited Hanul Jeon CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
S Nov 22, 2020 at 19:41 history suggested gmvh
Added top-level tag
Nov 22, 2020 at 19:37 review Suggested edits
S Nov 22, 2020 at 19:41
Nov 22, 2020 at 16:55 comment added Asaf Karagila Looking at the Lubarsky–Rathjen definition, it seems that their $H(V_\kappa)$ is the same as Goldberg's $H_\kappa$.
Nov 22, 2020 at 14:43 comment added Asaf Karagila I suppose the natural line of reasoning is to show that models of $\sf ZF_2^-$ are closed under Lindenbaum numbers, as a start.
Nov 22, 2020 at 14:15 comment added Asaf Karagila It was mentioned at the end, during the questions part.
Nov 22, 2020 at 14:14 comment added Hanul Jeon I don't understand myself why I don't remember it, although I also took this talk.
Nov 22, 2020 at 14:06 comment added Asaf Karagila He mentioned it in his Bristol-Oxford talk. $H_\kappa$ is the union of all transitive sets which are the image of $V_\alpha$ for $\alpha<\kappa$. I think this one works better in the context of large cardinals, though.
Nov 22, 2020 at 14:03 comment added Hanul Jeon @Asaf Holmes' definition could be the same as that of Lubarsky and Rathjen up to some modifications (like replacing $<\kappa$ to $\kappa$), as both of them refer to the same Jech's paper (but I do not check it yet.) Also, I wonder how I can find Goldberg's definition.
Nov 22, 2020 at 13:55 comment added Asaf Karagila Apparently there's also one due to Randall Holmes, for which $H_\kappa$ would contain only well orderable sets; but presumably $H_{V_\kappa}$ might work. And there's Gabe Goldberg's definition, but that one is a bit like Holmes' when using $V_\kappa$ instead of $\kappa$, I think, but probably not really the same.
Nov 22, 2020 at 12:28 history asked Hanul Jeon CC BY-SA 4.0