Timeline for Extension of homeomorphisms
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 21, 2020 at 23:17 | history | became hot network question | |||
Nov 21, 2020 at 16:36 | vote | accept | ABIM | ||
Nov 21, 2020 at 16:24 | answer | added | skupers | timeline score: 8 | |
Nov 21, 2020 at 16:13 | comment | added | ABIM | Ah, you mean it should read $\iota_m^{m+k}\circ f$? Sorry about the notation abuse. | |
Nov 21, 2020 at 16:12 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
Nov 21, 2020 at 16:08 | comment | added | skupers | I don't understand the question. It seems $f$ and $\phi \circ \iota_m^{m+k} \circ g$ don't have the same target. | |
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:56 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:47 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:31 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:26 | comment | added | ABIM | @MarcoGolla I refined my question to bypass this pathology. So now, this comment implies that $k\geq 1$. Also, it is easy to see that $k\leq n+m$. | |
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:26 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 309 characters in body
|
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:22 | comment | added | Marco Golla | No, not even if you ask that $f$ and $g$ be proper. For instance, any (long) knot in $\mathbb R^3$ gives an example. | |
Nov 21, 2020 at 15:16 | history | asked | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |