Skip to main content
removed capitals from title, added tag
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Feynman Path Integralpath integral and Wilsonian Renormalizationrenormalization

Try to fix issues raised in the comments
Source Link
iolo
  • 651
  • 3
  • 11

Everything below is to be viewed in the Euclidean setting with $d$ dimensions and all measures are understood to be Borel measures.

The usual problem of Quantum Field Theory is to make sense of Feynman Path Integrals like

\begin{equation} \int \exp \left[- \frac{m^2}{2} \int \phi^2 + \frac{Z}{2} \int \phi \Delta \phi - \lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \mathrm{d} \phi \end{equation}

where the outer integral is supposed to run over some space of test functions. It is well-known that this does not really work. What one can do, however, is for $\lambda = 0$ to produce a "cylinder setGaussian probability measure"measure on e.g the space $\mathcal{S}$$\mathcal{S}'$ of Schwartz functionstempered distributions. More generally this works for any continuous positive definite bilinear form on $\mathcal{S}$ and the resulting cylinder set measure may be pushed forward to $\mathcal{S}'$ where it miraculously becomes a true Gaussian probability measure. Hence, for such theories we know what we are doing!

With $\lambda \neq 0$ this is no longer the case. In order to ensure the finiteness of expressions of the form $\int \phi^4$ we would like $\phi$ to live in $\mathcal{S}$. To this end, we pick two non-negative mollifiers $\chi, \xi \in \mathcal{D}$ with $\xi \left( 0 \right) = 1$. Furthermore, for any $\epsilon > 0$ and $\Lambda > 0$, define

\begin{aligned} \chi_\epsilon \left( x \right) &= \epsilon^{-d} \chi \left( \frac{x}{\epsilon} \right) \\ \xi_\Lambda \left( x \right) &= \xi \left( \frac{x}{\Lambda} \right) \\ \end{aligned}

and consider the continuous (? - it should certainly be Borel measurable) mapping

\begin{aligned} \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) : \mathcal{S}' &\to \mathcal{S} \\ T &\mapsto \xi_\Lambda \cdot \left( \chi_\epsilon \ast T \right) \, . \end{aligned}

We may now take a Gaussian measure $\mu$ on $\mathcal{S}'$ corresponding to some bilinear theory and regularize it as $\left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu$ to a measure on $\mathcal{S}$. One can then define measures

\begin{equation} \nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \exp \left[ -\lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \cdot \left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu \end{equation}

normalize them, push them to $\mathcal{S}'$ again and study their behaviour as $ \left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right) \to \left( 0, \infty \right)$. But this also does not work as it just produces the expected divergences coming from attempting to multiply distributions. Instead, one has to give up on keeping the model parameters $m, Z, \lambda$ constant and let them depend on $\epsilon$ and $\Lambda$ (i.e on cutoffs) instead. One might then hope that for some nice $\left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right)$-dependence a limit (or at least a cluster point) $\nu_{0, \infty}$ indeed exists.

From a Wilsonian point of view, we would however like to split thistake $\nu_{0, \infty}$ into "fast" and "slow" modes depending onintegrate out degrees of freedom that are cut off by $\epsilon$$\epsilon > 0$ and $\Lambda$$\Lambda > 0$. That is, we want to fixWe may do this by fixing a collectionfamily $\left( \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \right)_{\epsilon \ge 0, \Lambda \le \infty}$$\left( \alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \right)_{\epsilon, \Lambda > 0}$ of Gaussian probability measures on $\mathcal{S}'$ such thatsatisfying the following properties for all $\epsilon, \delta > 0$ and all $\Lambda, \kappa > 0$$\epsilon, \delta, \Lambda, \kappa > 0$:

  • $\nu_{0, \infty}$ factorizes over $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$, i.e $\nu_{0, \infty} = \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ for some probability measure $\tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ on $\mathcal{S}'$$\alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \gg \nu_{0, \infty}$
  • $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \mu_{\delta, \kappa} = \mu_{\epsilon+\delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}$$\alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \alpha_{\delta, \kappa} = \alpha_{\epsilon+\delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}$ (or someway similar)
  • $\lim_{\epsilon \to 0, \Lambda \to \infty} \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \mu_{0, \infty}$

where somehow $\nu_\epsilon$ and $\tilde{\nu}_\epsilon$ should be related. ThenThen we obtain a renormalization group equation

\begin{equation} \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon + \delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}} \ast \mu_{\delta, \kappa} \end{equation}

as well as\begin{equation} \frac{\mathrm{d} \nu_{0, \infty}}{\mathrm{d} \alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda}} \left( T \right) = \int_{\mathcal{S}'} \frac{\mathrm{d} \nu_{0, \infty}}{\mathrm{d} \alpha_{\epsilon + \delta, \frac{\Lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}} \left( T + R \right) \mathrm{d} \alpha_{\delta, \kappa} \left( R \right) \end{equation}

\begin{equation} \tilde{\nu}_{0, \infty} = \mu_{0, \infty} \ast \lim_{\epsilon \to 0, \Lambda \to \infty} \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \end{equation} for all $\epsilon, \delta, \Lambda, \kappa > 0$.

But,Are these lines of thought correct? And presuming the existence of some nice QFT corresponding to $\nu_0$$\nu_{0, \infty}$, can we always find such a family $\alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$?

  • Why would such a decomposition with respect to a such a family $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ exist? i.e why can we separate fast and slow modes in an arbitrary way?
  • How do we relate $\nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ and $\tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ i.e how do we understand the map from bare to renormalized quantities and/or vice versa?

EDIT: I removed the other questions as they turned out not to make too much sense.

PS: The above is pretty much as far as my level of mathematics goes. Please try to not go too much further.

Everything below is to be viewed in the Euclidean setting with $d$ dimensions and all measures are understood to be Borel measures.

The usual problem of Quantum Field Theory is to make sense of Feynman Path Integrals like

\begin{equation} \int \exp \left[- \frac{m^2}{2} \int \phi^2 + \frac{Z}{2} \int \phi \Delta \phi - \lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \mathrm{d} \phi \end{equation}

where the outer integral is supposed to run over some space of test functions. It is well-known that this does not really work. What one can do, however, is for $\lambda = 0$ to produce a "cylinder set probability measure" on e.g the space $\mathcal{S}$ of Schwartz functions. More generally this works for any continuous positive definite bilinear form on $\mathcal{S}$ and the resulting cylinder set measure may be pushed forward to $\mathcal{S}'$ where it miraculously becomes a true Gaussian probability measure. Hence, for such theories we know what we are doing!

With $\lambda \neq 0$ this is no longer the case. In order to ensure the finiteness of expressions of the form $\int \phi^4$ we would like $\phi$ to live in $\mathcal{S}$. To this end, we pick two non-negative mollifiers $\chi, \xi \in \mathcal{D}$ with $\xi \left( 0 \right) = 1$. Furthermore, for any $\epsilon > 0$ and $\Lambda > 0$, define

\begin{aligned} \chi_\epsilon \left( x \right) &= \epsilon^{-d} \chi \left( \frac{x}{\epsilon} \right) \\ \xi_\Lambda \left( x \right) &= \xi \left( \frac{x}{\Lambda} \right) \\ \end{aligned}

and consider the continuous (? - it should certainly be Borel measurable) mapping

\begin{aligned} \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) : \mathcal{S}' &\to \mathcal{S} \\ T &\mapsto \xi_\Lambda \cdot \left( \chi_\epsilon \ast T \right) \, . \end{aligned}

We may now take a Gaussian measure $\mu$ on $\mathcal{S}'$ corresponding to some bilinear theory and regularize it as $\left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu$ to a measure on $\mathcal{S}$. One can then define measures

\begin{equation} \nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \exp \left[ -\lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \cdot \left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu \end{equation}

normalize them, push them to $\mathcal{S}'$ again and study their behaviour as $ \left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right) \to \left( 0, \infty \right)$. But this also does not work as it just produces the expected divergences coming from attempting to multiply distributions. Instead, one has to give up on keeping the model parameters $m, Z, \lambda$ constant and let them depend on $\epsilon$ and $\Lambda$ (i.e on cutoffs) instead. One might then hope that for some nice $\left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right)$-dependence a limit (or at least a cluster point) $\nu_{0, \infty}$ indeed exists.

From a Wilsonian point of view, we would however like to split this $\nu_{0, \infty}$ into "fast" and "slow" modes depending on $\epsilon$ and $\Lambda$. That is, we want to fix a collection $\left( \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \right)_{\epsilon \ge 0, \Lambda \le \infty}$ of probability measures on $\mathcal{S}'$ such that for all $\epsilon, \delta > 0$ and all $\Lambda, \kappa > 0$

  • $\nu_{0, \infty}$ factorizes over $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$, i.e $\nu_{0, \infty} = \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ for some probability measure $\tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ on $\mathcal{S}'$
  • $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \mu_{\delta, \kappa} = \mu_{\epsilon+\delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}$ (or someway similar)
  • $\lim_{\epsilon \to 0, \Lambda \to \infty} \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \mu_{0, \infty}$

where somehow $\nu_\epsilon$ and $\tilde{\nu}_\epsilon$ should be related. Then we obtain a renormalization group equation

\begin{equation} \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon + \delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}} \ast \mu_{\delta, \kappa} \end{equation}

as well as

\begin{equation} \tilde{\nu}_{0, \infty} = \mu_{0, \infty} \ast \lim_{\epsilon \to 0, \Lambda \to \infty} \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \end{equation}

But, presuming the existence of some nice QFT corresponding to $\nu_0$

  • Why would such a decomposition with respect to a such a family $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ exist? i.e why can we separate fast and slow modes in an arbitrary way?
  • How do we relate $\nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ and $\tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ i.e how do we understand the map from bare to renormalized quantities and/or vice versa?

PS: The above is pretty much as far as my level of mathematics goes. Please try to not go too much further.

Everything below is to be viewed in the Euclidean setting with $d$ dimensions and all measures are understood to be Borel measures.

The usual problem of Quantum Field Theory is to make sense of Feynman Path Integrals like

\begin{equation} \int \exp \left[- \frac{m^2}{2} \int \phi^2 + \frac{Z}{2} \int \phi \Delta \phi - \lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \mathrm{d} \phi \end{equation}

where the outer integral is supposed to run over some space of test functions. It is well-known that this does not really work. What one can do, however, is for $\lambda = 0$ to produce a Gaussian probability measure on e.g the space $\mathcal{S}'$ of tempered distributions. More generally this works for any continuous positive definite bilinear form on $\mathcal{S}$. Hence, for such theories we know what we are doing!

With $\lambda \neq 0$ this is no longer the case. In order to ensure the finiteness of expressions of the form $\int \phi^4$ we would like $\phi$ to live in $\mathcal{S}$. To this end, we pick two non-negative mollifiers $\chi, \xi \in \mathcal{D}$ with $\xi \left( 0 \right) = 1$. Furthermore, for any $\epsilon > 0$ and $\Lambda > 0$, define

\begin{aligned} \chi_\epsilon \left( x \right) &= \epsilon^{-d} \chi \left( \frac{x}{\epsilon} \right) \\ \xi_\Lambda \left( x \right) &= \xi \left( \frac{x}{\Lambda} \right) \\ \end{aligned}

and consider the continuous (? - it should certainly be Borel measurable) mapping

\begin{aligned} \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) : \mathcal{S}' &\to \mathcal{S} \\ T &\mapsto \xi_\Lambda \cdot \left( \chi_\epsilon \ast T \right) \, . \end{aligned}

We may now take a Gaussian measure $\mu$ on $\mathcal{S}'$ corresponding to some bilinear theory and regularize it as $\left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu$ to a measure on $\mathcal{S}$. One can then define measures

\begin{equation} \nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \exp \left[ -\lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \cdot \left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu \end{equation}

normalize them, push them to $\mathcal{S}'$ again and study their behaviour as $ \left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right) \to \left( 0, \infty \right)$. But this also does not work as it just produces the expected divergences coming from attempting to multiply distributions. Instead, one has to give up on keeping the model parameters $m, Z, \lambda$ constant and let them depend on $\epsilon$ and $\Lambda$ (i.e on cutoffs) instead. One might then hope that for some nice $\left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right)$-dependence a limit (or at least a cluster point) $\nu_{0, \infty}$ indeed exists.

From a Wilsonian point of view, we would however like to take $\nu_{0, \infty}$ and integrate out degrees of freedom that are cut off by $\epsilon > 0$ and $\Lambda > 0$. We may do this by fixing a family $\left( \alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \right)_{\epsilon, \Lambda > 0}$ of Gaussian probability measures on $\mathcal{S}'$ satisfying the following properties for all $\epsilon, \delta, \Lambda, \kappa > 0$:

  • $\alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \gg \nu_{0, \infty}$
  • $\alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \alpha_{\delta, \kappa} = \alpha_{\epsilon+\delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}$ (or someway similar)

Then we obtain a renormalization group equation

\begin{equation} \frac{\mathrm{d} \nu_{0, \infty}}{\mathrm{d} \alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda}} \left( T \right) = \int_{\mathcal{S}'} \frac{\mathrm{d} \nu_{0, \infty}}{\mathrm{d} \alpha_{\epsilon + \delta, \frac{\Lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}} \left( T + R \right) \mathrm{d} \alpha_{\delta, \kappa} \left( R \right) \end{equation}

for all $\epsilon, \delta, \Lambda, \kappa > 0$.

Are these lines of thought correct? And presuming the existence of some nice QFT corresponding to $\nu_{0, \infty}$, can we always find such a family $\alpha_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$?

EDIT: I removed the other questions as they turned out not to make too much sense.

PS: The above is pretty much as far as my level of mathematics goes. Please try to not go too much further.

Source Link
iolo
  • 651
  • 3
  • 11

Feynman Path Integral and Wilsonian Renormalization

Everything below is to be viewed in the Euclidean setting with $d$ dimensions and all measures are understood to be Borel measures.

The usual problem of Quantum Field Theory is to make sense of Feynman Path Integrals like

\begin{equation} \int \exp \left[- \frac{m^2}{2} \int \phi^2 + \frac{Z}{2} \int \phi \Delta \phi - \lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \mathrm{d} \phi \end{equation}

where the outer integral is supposed to run over some space of test functions. It is well-known that this does not really work. What one can do, however, is for $\lambda = 0$ to produce a "cylinder set probability measure" on e.g the space $\mathcal{S}$ of Schwartz functions. More generally this works for any continuous positive definite bilinear form on $\mathcal{S}$ and the resulting cylinder set measure may be pushed forward to $\mathcal{S}'$ where it miraculously becomes a true Gaussian probability measure. Hence, for such theories we know what we are doing!

With $\lambda \neq 0$ this is no longer the case. In order to ensure the finiteness of expressions of the form $\int \phi^4$ we would like $\phi$ to live in $\mathcal{S}$. To this end, we pick two non-negative mollifiers $\chi, \xi \in \mathcal{D}$ with $\xi \left( 0 \right) = 1$. Furthermore, for any $\epsilon > 0$ and $\Lambda > 0$, define

\begin{aligned} \chi_\epsilon \left( x \right) &= \epsilon^{-d} \chi \left( \frac{x}{\epsilon} \right) \\ \xi_\Lambda \left( x \right) &= \xi \left( \frac{x}{\Lambda} \right) \\ \end{aligned}

and consider the continuous (? - it should certainly be Borel measurable) mapping

\begin{aligned} \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) : \mathcal{S}' &\to \mathcal{S} \\ T &\mapsto \xi_\Lambda \cdot \left( \chi_\epsilon \ast T \right) \, . \end{aligned}

We may now take a Gaussian measure $\mu$ on $\mathcal{S}'$ corresponding to some bilinear theory and regularize it as $\left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu$ to a measure on $\mathcal{S}$. One can then define measures

\begin{equation} \nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \exp \left[ -\lambda \int \phi^4 \right] \cdot \left[ \mathcal{M} \left( \xi_\Lambda \right) \mathcal{C} \left( \chi_\epsilon \right) \right]_\ast \mu \end{equation}

normalize them, push them to $\mathcal{S}'$ again and study their behaviour as $ \left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right) \to \left( 0, \infty \right)$. But this also does not work as it just produces the expected divergences coming from attempting to multiply distributions. Instead, one has to give up on keeping the model parameters $m, Z, \lambda$ constant and let them depend on $\epsilon$ and $\Lambda$ (i.e on cutoffs) instead. One might then hope that for some nice $\left( \epsilon, \Lambda \right)$-dependence a limit (or at least a cluster point) $\nu_{0, \infty}$ indeed exists.

From a Wilsonian point of view, we would however like to split this $\nu_{0, \infty}$ into "fast" and "slow" modes depending on $\epsilon$ and $\Lambda$. That is, we want to fix a collection $\left( \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \right)_{\epsilon \ge 0, \Lambda \le \infty}$ of probability measures on $\mathcal{S}'$ such that for all $\epsilon, \delta > 0$ and all $\Lambda, \kappa > 0$

  • $\nu_{0, \infty}$ factorizes over $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$, i.e $\nu_{0, \infty} = \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ for some probability measure $\tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ on $\mathcal{S}'$
  • $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \ast \mu_{\delta, \kappa} = \mu_{\epsilon+\delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}}$ (or someway similar)
  • $\lim_{\epsilon \to 0, \Lambda \to \infty} \mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \mu_{0, \infty}$

where somehow $\nu_\epsilon$ and $\tilde{\nu}_\epsilon$ should be related. Then we obtain a renormalization group equation

\begin{equation} \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} = \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon + \delta, \frac{\lambda \kappa}{\Lambda + \kappa}} \ast \mu_{\delta, \kappa} \end{equation}

as well as

\begin{equation} \tilde{\nu}_{0, \infty} = \mu_{0, \infty} \ast \lim_{\epsilon \to 0, \Lambda \to \infty} \tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda} \end{equation}

But, presuming the existence of some nice QFT corresponding to $\nu_0$

  • Why would such a decomposition with respect to a such a family $\mu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ exist? i.e why can we separate fast and slow modes in an arbitrary way?
  • How do we relate $\nu_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ and $\tilde{\nu}_{\epsilon, \Lambda}$ i.e how do we understand the map from bare to renormalized quantities and/or vice versa?

PS: The above is pretty much as far as my level of mathematics goes. Please try to not go too much further.