Timeline for Natural equivalence of Dehn and spherical twist of Fukaya category
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 14 at 13:12 | answer | added | Shuo Zhang | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 4, 2020 at 18:10 | comment | added | Merlin Christ | A functor assigns objects to objects and morphisms to morphisms. Two functors are pointwise equivalent if they assing to each object equivalent objects. | |
Dec 3, 2020 at 17:04 | comment | added | Filip | What does the word "pointwise" in "pointwise both twist functors are equivalent" mean? | |
Nov 19, 2020 at 14:29 | comment | added | Zack | Consider the Lefschetz fibration $W_L$ with fiber $M$ and single vanishing cycle $L$. Then $\mathcal{FS}(W_L)$ is the ground ring $\mathbb k$, and the cup/Orlov functor is the coYoneda map $\hom(L, \cdot)$. It follows that the dual cotwist of the cup functor is the algebraic twist along $L$, while the monodromy is Dehn twist along $L$ (with a shift). | |
Nov 19, 2020 at 7:04 | comment | added | Merlin Christ | I don't really understand, could you be more specific why Theorem 1.2 is relevant for my question? | |
Nov 19, 2020 at 4:21 | comment | added | Zack | I doubt this is the first proof, but in the case where $M$ is Weinstein I think this follows from Theorem 1.2 of arxiv.org/abs/1908.02317. In the non-Weinstein case something similar should be possible by identifying the semiorthogonal gluing as a full subcategory of $\mathcal{FS}(W_L^2)$, where $W_L^2$ is the square of the Lefschetz fibration with vanishing cycle $L$, but I haven't worked it out. | |
Nov 18, 2020 at 18:07 | history | edited | Merlin Christ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body; edited title
|
Nov 18, 2020 at 18:05 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 18, 2020 at 19:12 | |||||
Nov 18, 2020 at 18:02 | history | asked | Merlin Christ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |