Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

added 93 characters in body
Source Link
David Roberts ♦
David Roberts ♦
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

As I'm just a layperson I don't understand the technicalities involved, but does the paper New Large Cardinal Axioms and the Ultimate-L Program, by Rupert McCallum (arXiv:this paper1812.03837) prove the inconsistency of a Reinhardt cardinal? If so can someone explain how given the results of the paper one proves Reinhardt cardinals to be inconsistent in ZF+DC?

As I'm just a layperson I don't understand the technicalities involved, but does this paper prove the inconsistency of a Reinhardt cardinal? If so can someone explain how given the results of the paper one proves Reinhardt cardinals to be inconsistent in ZF+DC?

As I'm just a layperson I don't understand the technicalities involved, but does the paper New Large Cardinal Axioms and the Ultimate-L Program, by Rupert McCallum (arXiv:1812.03837) prove the inconsistency of a Reinhardt cardinal? If so can someone explain how given the results of the paper one proves Reinhardt cardinals to be inconsistent in ZF+DC?

Source Link
Someone211
Someone211
  • 419
  • 3
  • 9

Inconsistency of Reinhardt cardinals in ZF+DC

As I'm just a layperson I don't understand the technicalities involved, but does this paper prove the inconsistency of a Reinhardt cardinal? If so can someone explain how given the results of the paper one proves Reinhardt cardinals to be inconsistent in ZF+DC?