Timeline for Explicit formula for the codifferential of a 2-form
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2021 at 21:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 2, 2021 at 21:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 3, 2020 at 20:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 3, 2020 at 23:01 | comment | added | TK-421 | Without looking at the two books, I'm guessing this is simply a difference of convention for the summation on the indices of the 2-form. Afterall, $dx^i\wedge dx^j=-dx^j\wedge dx^i$, meaning there could be two different notations for the components based on how the summation works (i.e. sum over $i,j$ independently or sum over $i<j$).Though I haven't checked the formulas closely so perhaps I'm off on this. But it's worth checking. | |
| Nov 3, 2020 at 19:07 | answer | added | Laithy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 3, 2020 at 18:26 | history | asked | Paul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |