Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 2, 2010 at 15:16 comment added Louigi Addario-Berry But there are constants. Together Theorem 1.1 (ii) and Proposition 4.1 imply that, viewing the circle as the unit circle in the complex plane, the expected distance from 1 to $e^{2 \pi i u}$ is about $2.0(n u (1-u))^{\beta}$, where $\beta = (\sqrt{17}-3)/2$. (The 2.0 here is a pretty good approximation to what is in fact a ratio of Gamma functions.) This gives expected distance a little over 12 between $1$ and $-1$, for example.
Sep 2, 2010 at 14:34 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @louigi: Cool! That evaluates to approx. 13 for $n{=}100$.
Sep 2, 2010 at 14:21 comment added Louigi Addario-Berry The height of that tree is conjectured (by Nicolas Curien in a talk I saw) to be of the order n^{(sqrt(17)-3)/2} -- if you pick two uniformly random nodes, this will be the rough distance between them. But an argument is missing to show that there is no small exceptional set of nodes at greater distance from one another.
Sep 2, 2010 at 13:55 comment added Joseph O'Rourke Ah, thanks! I would never have hit upon "random geodesic laminations"!
Sep 2, 2010 at 13:51 history answered Gjergji Zaimi CC BY-SA 2.5