Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 25, 2020 at 21:01 comment added Damiano Mazza Like @SimonHenry says, the equivalence between the first and last of (2) holds for any algebraic theory and, if I am not mistaken, appears as Proposition 6.3.1 in SGA 4 (although of course they do not use the terminology "algebraic theory"). But maybe you are looking for a reference mentioning the whole chain of equivalences? For what concerns (1), again I may be mistaken but I think it is (a special case of) Proposition 6.7 of SGA 4.
Oct 24, 2020 at 18:44 history became hot network question
Oct 24, 2020 at 12:44 comment added Ivan Di Liberti @SimonHenry, I agree with you. I was asking because I might want to cite it.
Oct 24, 2020 at 12:42 comment added Simon Henry I don't understand which part of (2) is non-trivial ? The equivalence between the first and the last is pretty obvious if you just write what it means to be an abelian group in Sh(C,J) vs a sheaf of abelian group (it works for any algebraic theory)
Oct 24, 2020 at 12:21 answer added fosco timeline score: 9
Oct 24, 2020 at 10:50 history edited Ivan Di Liberti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 86 characters in body
Oct 24, 2020 at 10:44 history asked Ivan Di Liberti CC BY-SA 4.0