Timeline for irreducible representations of O(2) - reference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2013 at 18:31 | answer | added | Marc Palm | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 15:14 | comment | added | mathphysicist | @Jose: I've just undeleted the answer. | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 14:06 | history | edited | Orbicular | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 90 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2010 at 13:52 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | @mathphysicist: I would undelete your answer and simply point out the above "caveat". | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 13:51 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | If you are interested in complex irreps, then the book mentioned in the (deleted) answer by mathphysicist has the answer: it is Theorem 11.3, except that as stated the theorem is not right because it fails to mention that this is true for complex irreps. | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 13:02 | comment | added | mathphysicist | For SO(n,C), see Theorem 2 here: books.google.com/books?id=Mi1fy70II8cC&pg=PA221 | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 12:00 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Real or complex? | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 9:32 | history | edited | mathphysicist |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 2, 2010 at 9:32 | answer | added | mathphysicist | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 9:22 | history | asked | Orbicular | CC BY-SA 2.5 |