Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 31, 2020 at 3:21 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
Oct 17, 2020 at 1:13 history became hot network question
Oct 16, 2020 at 19:54 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Oct 16, 2020 at 19:49 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 212 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 19:31 answer added Joao Costalonga timeline score: 3
Oct 16, 2020 at 19:25 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 229 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 18:37 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 244 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 18:24 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 231 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 18:09 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 18 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 18:02 comment added Ethan Splaver @LorenzoNajt Sorry havn't slept in a while, you are correct. I also updated the condition on the indexing so it should be when is there a walk in the intersection graph hitting every vertex which is equivilent to connectedness
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:59 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 17 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:54 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 17 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:54 vote accept Ethan Splaver
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:51 comment added Elle Najt @Ethan Yeah, but that doesn't contradict what I'm saying. I mean that a unicycle gives an example of a graph with your property that is not 2-edge connected. (Maybe your 'iff' is meant to be an 'if'? Actually I'm not sure about that either, e.g. consider the wedge of 2 circuits at a single point. It's 2 edge connected, but the circuit graph consists of two isolated points.)
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:46 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 390 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:45 comment added Ethan Splaver @LorenzoNajt if its $2$-edge connected and a unicycle graph then it is a cycle graph, no?
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:43 comment added Elle Najt @Ethan Is that condition about the graphic matroid right? For instance, a unicycle graph has a single circuit, so the intersection graph is connected, but it is not 2-edge connected.
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:42 comment added Tony Huynh Your two conditions are still not equivalent. Your first condition is saying that the intersection graph has a Hamiltonian path, while the second condition is saying it is connected. I answered the connected version below.
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:40 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 390 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:39 answer added Tony Huynh timeline score: 5
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:28 comment added Sam Hopkins (Actually I guess there could be a connected component which has no circuits, i.e., a unique base.)
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:26 comment added Sam Hopkins Here's a first stab: evidently the matroid itself must be connected. I don't know if that's sufficient.
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:24 comment added Ethan Splaver @SamHopkins made a slight error, updated it
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:24 history edited Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 73 characters in body
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:22 comment added Sam Hopkins I don't see why the two questions you posed are equivalent. The first seems to be saying that the intersection graph of circuits has no isolated vertices, which is different from it being connected.
Oct 16, 2020 at 17:11 history asked Ethan Splaver CC BY-SA 4.0