Skip to main content
Added refs
Source Link

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. They prove local contractibility, which is more than I asked. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts (Local arcwise connectivity in the space $H^n$ of homeomorphisms of $S^n$ onto itself, Summary of Lectures, Summer Institute on Set Theoretic Topology, Madison, Wisconsin, 1955, p. 100) but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser (Die Deformationssätze der einfach zusammenhägenden Flächen, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Vol. 25(1926), pp. 362-372) as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. They prove local contractibility, which is more than I asked. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. They prove local contractibility, which is more than I asked. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts (Local arcwise connectivity in the space $H^n$ of homeomorphisms of $S^n$ onto itself, Summary of Lectures, Summer Institute on Set Theoretic Topology, Madison, Wisconsin, 1955, p. 100) but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser (Die Deformationssätze der einfach zusammenhägenden Flächen, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Vol. 25(1926), pp. 362-372) as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.

added 62 characters in body
Source Link

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. They prove local contractibility, which is more than I asked. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. They prove local contractibility, which is more than I asked. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.

Source Link

In the particular case of surfaces, I found the following reference which includes a proof that is not too complicated: Regular Mappings and the Space of Homeomorphisms on 2-Manifolds by Hamstrom and Dyer. It works for surfaces with or without boundaries and includes a slight generalization with fixed points on the boundary. This is Theorem 1 in this article. The proof fits in 6 pages, is a bit heavy on notations but this remains managable. Unfortunately there is no figure. The proof uses conformal maps for a couple of lemmas, Alexander's trick, and a technique due to J.H. Roberts but I cannot find the corresponding reference. They also cite a German article of Kneser as a source of inspiration, but my knowledge of German is very basic so reading it would represent quite an investment.