Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

typo in Ramero's name
Source Link
Piotr Achinger
Piotr Achinger
  • 16.1k
  • 2
  • 49
  • 90

I don't understand the definition of $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and RomeroRamero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.

I don't understand the definition of $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and Romero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.

I don't understand the definition of $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and Ramero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.

added 26 characters in body
Source Link
curious math guy
curious math guy
  • 4.4k
  • 9
  • 29

I don't understand the definition of $\Omega_A$$\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and Romero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\Omega_A$$\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.

I don't understand the definition of $\Omega_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and Romero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\Omega_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.

I don't understand the definition of $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and Romero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.

Source Link
curious math guy
curious math guy
  • 4.4k
  • 9
  • 29

Almost ring theory and derivations

I don't understand the definition of $\Omega_A$ in the context of almost rings. In Gabber and Romero https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409584.pdf it is covered in 9.6.12. How is $\Omega_A$ defined? What is the difference to the usual Kähler module? I'm really sorry, but I'm lost.