Timeline for To show a set is a set of positive Lebesgue measure in $ \mathbb{R}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2020 at 7:28 | comment | added | Duplicate | You probably get it wrong. Given the set $E$ I am asking whether there is $l>0$(obviously depending on $E$) such that the above intersection is non-empty or not. For example if your $E=(0,1)$ then if we take $l=0.001$ then the above intersection will be non-empty. | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 21:27 | comment | added | David Handelman | There is possibly something wrong with the formulation of this question. First, you might as well assume that $l=1$. Second, if $E $ is the any proper subset of the open interval $(0,1)$, then the intersection is going to be empty. Perhaps you mean $E$ is a subset of full measure (that is, its complement has measure zero)? | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 8:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 7, 2020 at 8:50 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2020 at 5:51 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 10, 2020 at 14:24 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2020 at 5:33 | vote | accept | Duplicate | ||
| Oct 7, 2020 at 5:16 | answer | added | Martin Väth | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 4:39 | history | asked | Duplicate | CC BY-SA 4.0 |