Timeline for Treating citation numbers as objects
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2020 at 16:05 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | I also would like to mention that using the name of the first author is annoying for the alphabetically challenged among us... | |
| Oct 5, 2020 at 20:13 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Oct 5, 2020 at 18:39 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | I just checked a few pages from one of my own papers and found that about half of the citations there are "wrong". So "wrong" must not really be wrong. | |
| Oct 5, 2020 at 18:04 | comment | added | LSpice | A favourite of mine is to find out that [1] is a citation to all 10 parts of a 10-part paper. This is bad enough when done by someone else, but when done by the author of those papers who should know (or be able to grep the TeX of) the contents, it is downright annoying. (It's better than "the result is well known", at least.) | |
| Oct 5, 2020 at 18:00 | comment | added | Jochen Glueck | +1000 for your last sentence! | |
| Oct 5, 2020 at 17:24 | history | answered | David White | CC BY-SA 4.0 |