Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 30, 2020 at 19:27 comment added Gustave Thank you sur for the answer. Good chance.
Sep 29, 2020 at 22:59 comment added Nate Eldredge In your question you used the open interval $(0,1)$. If you want the closed interval then simply modify it: $$A(x) = \begin{cases} xI, & x \ne 0 \\ I, & x = 0. \end{cases}$$ Of course if you intended for $A$ to be continuous then it will change things, and you can use compactness to argue that in this case the singular values (or some other measure of surjectivity) are indeed bounded away from zero.
Sep 29, 2020 at 20:38 comment added Gustave I see that in your example $A(x)=xI$ is not invertible for any $x$ in $[0,1]$ (for example x=0).
Sep 29, 2020 at 19:01 comment added Nate Eldredge It's not enough. Even take $n=2$ and $A(x) = xI$, you have exactly the same problem as in my previous example. Anyway, your new statement is equivalent to saying that every $A(x)$ has rank $2$, up to a change of basis. Unless you want $B$ to be independent of $x$, in which case that is sufficient but much too strong.
Sep 29, 2020 at 18:16 comment added Gustave thank you for the interest. In fact, I believe that the right condition is that the matrix A must contains a mini matrix B 2×2 that it is invertible. What do you think sir?
Sep 29, 2020 at 13:43 comment added Nate Eldredge This is not even true for $1 \times 1$ matrices, i.e. scalars; the scalar function $A(x)=x$ is "full rank" at every $x$, but $f \mapsto Af$ is not onto; the constant function $1$ is not in its image (because if $Af = 1$ then $f(x) = 1/x$ which is not in $L^2$). I think a more plausible condition would be something like "singular values bounded away from 0".
Sep 29, 2020 at 7:15 history asked Gustave CC BY-SA 4.0