Skip to main content
fi
Source Link
Richard Stanley
  • 50.8k
  • 14
  • 155
  • 279

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?

For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first (determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choosechooses first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion is 0110.

What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse sequence (https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html).

Another argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial $(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$ derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the problem of maximizing $k$?

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?

For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first (determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion is 0110.

What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse sequence (https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html).

Another argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial $(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$ derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the problem of maximizing $k$?

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?

For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first (determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 chooses first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion is 0110.

What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse sequence (https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html).

Another argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial $(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$ derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the problem of maximizing $k$?

minor copyediting
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly
equal equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one
at at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?
For

For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first
   (determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we
denote denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the
choice choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose
first first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased
toward toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both
have have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion
is is 0110. 

What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made
that that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse
sequence
sequence (https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html). 

Another
argument argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one
that that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial
   $(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$
derivatives derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have
this this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the
problem problem of maximizing $k$?

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly
equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one
at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?
For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first
 (determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we
denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the
choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose
first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased
toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both
have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion
is 0110. What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made
that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse
sequence
(https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html). Another
argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one
that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial
 $(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$
derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have
this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the
problem of maximizing $k$?

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?

For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first  (determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion is 0110. 

What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse sequence (https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html). 

Another argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial  $(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$ derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the problem of maximizing $k$?

http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly
equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one
at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?
For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first
(determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we
denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the
choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose
first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased
toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both
have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion
is 0110. What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made
that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse
sequence
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.htmlhttps://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html). Another
argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one
that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial
$(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$
derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have
this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the
problem of maximizing $k$?

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly
equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one
at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?
For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first
(determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we
denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the
choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose
first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased
toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both
have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion
is 0110. What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made
that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse
sequence
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html). Another
argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one
that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial
$(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$
derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have
this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the
problem of maximizing $k$?

Suppose that a parent brings home from a trip $2n$ gifts of roughly
equal value for his/her two children. The children get to choose one
at a time which gifts they want. What is the fairest way to do this?
For instance, if $n=1$ then clearly one child chooses first
(determined by a coin flip) and the other child chooses second. If we
denote the children by 0 and 1, then this method is described by the
choice sequence 01 (assuming, as I do from now on, that 0 choose
first). Now suppose $n=2$. The choice sequence 0101 is clearly biased
toward 0, since 0 has the first choice at the beginning and after both
have chosen one gift. The fairest sequence by any reasonable criterion
is 0110. What about general $n$? If $n=2^k$, an argument can be made
that the fairest sequence is the first $n$ terms of the Thue-Morse
sequence
(https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Thue-MorseSequence.html). Another
argument can be made that the fairest sequence $a_1,\dots, a_n$ is one
that maximizes the value of $k$ for which the polynomial
$(1-2a_1)x^{n-1} + (1-2a_2)x^{n-2}+\cdots+(1-2a_n)$ and its first $k$
derivatives vanish at $x=1$. (The Thue-Morse sequence does not have
this property, though I cannot recall where I once saw this.)

Has this problem received any attention? What is a reference for the
problem of maximizing $k$?

edited tags
Link
Charles
  • 9.1k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76
Loading
new tag
Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121
Loading
added tag
Link
Gerry Myerson
  • 39.9k
  • 10
  • 186
  • 247
Loading
Source Link
Richard Stanley
  • 50.8k
  • 14
  • 155
  • 279
Loading