Skip to main content
Notice removed Canonical answer required by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with Martin Väth's answer chosen by CommunityBot
Notice added Canonical answer required by user124297
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by user124297
added 53 characters in body
Source Link
user124297
  • 343
  • 2
  • 8

Let $K \in M_+(R_+^2), f \in M_+(R_+)$. Consider operator

$$ (T_k)(x)=\int_{R_+}K(x,y)f(y)dy, \quad y\in R_+. $$

Denote by $f^*(t)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \alpha x \in R_+: \mu_f(y)>\lambda\}$ the non-increasing rearrangement of $f$. Here $\mu_f(y)=\{\alpha x\in R_+: |f(x)|>y\}$.

Let $\Phi(x)=\int_0^x \phi(y)\,dy$, $x \in \mathbb{R}_+$, be an N-function, and let $u$ be locally integrable on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Consider the gauge norm $$ \rho_{\Phi,u}(f)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \int_{\mathbb{R}_+}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\right)u(x)\,dx\leq 1\}, $$where $f \in M_+(R_+)$.

I am trying to find an example of such $u_1, u_2$ when Kantorovich conditions (stated that the $l_q$ norm of the kernel is finite) would not be true, but the following inequality would hold: $$ \rho_{\Phi_1,u_1}(T_Kf^*)\leq \rho_{\Phi_2,u_2}(f^*) $$

Let $K \in M_+(R_+^2), f \in M_+(R_+)$. Consider operator

$$ (T_k)(x)=\int_{R_+}K(x,y)f(y)dy, \quad y\in R_+. $$

Denote by $f^*(t)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \alpha x \in R_+: \mu_f(y)>\lambda\}$ the non-increasing rearrangement of $f$. Here $\mu_f(y)=\{\alpha x\in R_+: |f(x)|>y\}$.

Let $\Phi(x)=\int_0^x \phi(y)\,dy$, $x \in \mathbb{R}_+$, be an N-function, and let $u$ be locally integrable on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Consider the gauge norm $$ \rho_{\Phi,u}(f)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \int_{\mathbb{R}_+}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\right)u(x)\,dx\leq 1\}, $$where $f \in M_+(R_+)$.

I am trying to find an example of such $u_1, u_2$ when Kantorovich conditions would not be true, but the following inequality would hold: $$ \rho_{\Phi_1,u_1}(T_Kf^*)\leq \rho_{\Phi_2,u_2}(f^*) $$

Let $K \in M_+(R_+^2), f \in M_+(R_+)$. Consider operator

$$ (T_k)(x)=\int_{R_+}K(x,y)f(y)dy, \quad y\in R_+. $$

Denote by $f^*(t)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \alpha x \in R_+: \mu_f(y)>\lambda\}$ the non-increasing rearrangement of $f$. Here $\mu_f(y)=\{\alpha x\in R_+: |f(x)|>y\}$.

Let $\Phi(x)=\int_0^x \phi(y)\,dy$, $x \in \mathbb{R}_+$, be an N-function, and let $u$ be locally integrable on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Consider the gauge norm $$ \rho_{\Phi,u}(f)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \int_{\mathbb{R}_+}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\right)u(x)\,dx\leq 1\}, $$where $f \in M_+(R_+)$.

I am trying to find an example of such $u_1, u_2$ when Kantorovich conditions (stated that the $l_q$ norm of the kernel is finite) would not be true, but the following inequality would hold: $$ \rho_{\Phi_1,u_1}(T_Kf^*)\leq \rho_{\Phi_2,u_2}(f^*) $$

edited title
Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

Example when KantarovichKantorovich condition would not hold

added 1 character in body
Source Link
user124297
  • 343
  • 2
  • 8

Let $K \in M_+(R_+^2), f \in M_+(R_+)$. Consider operator

$$ (T_k)(x)=\int_{R_+}K(x,y)f(y)dy, \quad y\in R_+. $$

Denote by $f^*(t)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \alpha x \in R_+: \mu_f(y)>\lambda\}$ the non-increasing rearrangement of $f$. Here $\mu_f(y)=\{\alpha x\in R_+: |f(x)|>y\}$.

Let $\Phi(x)=\int_0^x \phi(y)\,dy$, $x \in \mathbb{R}_+$, be an N-function, and let $u$ be locally inferableintegrable on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Consider the gauge norm $$ \rho_{\Phi,u}(f)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \int_{\mathbb{R}_+}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\right)u(x)\,dx\leq 1\}, $$where $f \in M_+(R_+)$.

I am trying to find an example of such $u_1, u_2$ when Kantorovich conditions would not be true, but the following inequality would hold: $$ \rho_{\Phi_1,u_1}(T_Kf^*)\leq \rho_{\Phi_2,u_2}(f^*) $$

Let $K \in M_+(R_+^2), f \in M_+(R_+)$. Consider operator

$$ (T_k)(x)=\int_{R_+}K(x,y)f(y)dy, \quad y\in R_+. $$

Denote by $f^*(t)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \alpha x \in R_+: \mu_f(y)>\lambda\}$ the non-increasing rearrangement of $f$. Here $\mu_f(y)=\{\alpha x\in R_+: |f(x)|>y\}$.

Let $\Phi(x)=\int_0^x \phi(y)\,dy$, $x \in \mathbb{R}_+$, be an N-function, and let $u$ be locally inferable on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Consider the gauge norm $$ \rho_{\Phi,u}(f)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \int_{\mathbb{R}_+}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\right)u(x)\,dx\leq 1\}, $$where $f \in M_+(R_+)$.

I am trying to find an example of such $u_1, u_2$ when Kantorovich conditions would not be true, but the following inequality would hold: $$ \rho_{\Phi_1,u_1}(T_Kf^*)\leq \rho_{\Phi_2,u_2}(f^*) $$

Let $K \in M_+(R_+^2), f \in M_+(R_+)$. Consider operator

$$ (T_k)(x)=\int_{R_+}K(x,y)f(y)dy, \quad y\in R_+. $$

Denote by $f^*(t)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \alpha x \in R_+: \mu_f(y)>\lambda\}$ the non-increasing rearrangement of $f$. Here $\mu_f(y)=\{\alpha x\in R_+: |f(x)|>y\}$.

Let $\Phi(x)=\int_0^x \phi(y)\,dy$, $x \in \mathbb{R}_+$, be an N-function, and let $u$ be locally integrable on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Consider the gauge norm $$ \rho_{\Phi,u}(f)=\inf\{\lambda>0: \int_{\mathbb{R}_+}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\right)u(x)\,dx\leq 1\}, $$where $f \in M_+(R_+)$.

I am trying to find an example of such $u_1, u_2$ when Kantorovich conditions would not be true, but the following inequality would hold: $$ \rho_{\Phi_1,u_1}(T_Kf^*)\leq \rho_{\Phi_2,u_2}(f^*) $$

Source Link
user124297
  • 343
  • 2
  • 8
Loading