Skip to main content
Added links to theses, title of Wilson's thesis
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.5k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

I am quite interested in moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals, a letter from Deligne to Bhargava is cited in Wood's Melanie Wood's thesis “moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals”Moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals (pdf), studying the minimal free resolution of $n$ points in $\mathbb P^{n−2}$. It's also cited in the thesis of Kevin H. Wilson, Three perspectives on $n$ points in $\mathbb{P}^{n-2}$ (link) (after theoremTheorem 135):

Such strong canonicity in these multiplicative structures has been implicitly used by by many authors. For instance, Wright and Yukie [116] implicitly used this structure to parameterize parameterize rank n$n$ rings over Q$\mathbb{Q}$. And Bhargava also implicitly relied on a much stronger canonicity (over Z$\mathbb{Z}$) in structuring his Higher Composition Laws [9, 10, 11, 14]. Perhaps the place place where the idea of using such canonical multiplicative structures was first developed was in in Deligne’s letter to Bhargava [41] which inspired Wood’s vast generalization in her thesis [114, 113, 112] extending Bhargava’s quadratic, cubic, and quartic Higher Composition Laws to to arbitrary base schemes.

Where can I find a copy of this letter (or a short explanation of the idea)? Thank you very much.

I am quite interested in moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals, a letter from Deligne to Bhargava is cited in Wood's thesis “moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals”, studying the minimal free resolution of $n$ points in $\mathbb P^{n−2}$. It's also cited in the thesis of Kevin H. Wilson (after theorem 135)

Such strong canonicity in these multiplicative structures has been implicitly used by many authors. For instance, Wright and Yukie [116] implicitly used this structure to parameterize rank n rings over Q. And Bhargava also implicitly relied on a much stronger canonicity (over Z) in structuring his Higher Composition Laws [9, 10, 11, 14]. Perhaps the place where the idea of using such canonical multiplicative structures was first developed was in Deligne’s letter to Bhargava [41] which inspired Wood’s vast generalization in her thesis [114, 113, 112] extending Bhargava’s quadratic, cubic, and quartic Higher Composition Laws to arbitrary base schemes.

Where can I find a copy of this letter (or a short explanation of the idea)? Thank you very much.

I am quite interested in moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals, a letter from Deligne to Bhargava is cited in Melanie Wood's thesis Moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals (pdf), studying the minimal free resolution of $n$ points in $\mathbb P^{n−2}$. It's also cited in the thesis of Kevin H. Wilson, Three perspectives on $n$ points in $\mathbb{P}^{n-2}$ (link) (after Theorem 135):

Such strong canonicity in these multiplicative structures has been implicitly used by many authors. For instance, Wright and Yukie [116] implicitly used this structure to parameterize rank $n$ rings over $\mathbb{Q}$. And Bhargava also implicitly relied on a much stronger canonicity (over $\mathbb{Z}$) in structuring his Higher Composition Laws [9, 10, 11, 14]. Perhaps the place where the idea of using such canonical multiplicative structures was first developed was in Deligne’s letter to Bhargava [41] which inspired Wood’s vast generalization in her thesis [114, 113, 112] extending Bhargava’s quadratic, cubic, and quartic Higher Composition Laws to arbitrary base schemes.

Where can I find a copy of this letter (or a short explanation of the idea)? Thank you very much.

Source Link
loos
  • 461
  • 2
  • 8

Deligne's letter to Bhargava from March 2004

I am quite interested in moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals, a letter from Deligne to Bhargava is cited in Wood's thesis “moduli spaces for Rings and Ideals”, studying the minimal free resolution of $n$ points in $\mathbb P^{n−2}$. It's also cited in the thesis of Kevin H. Wilson (after theorem 135)

Such strong canonicity in these multiplicative structures has been implicitly used by many authors. For instance, Wright and Yukie [116] implicitly used this structure to parameterize rank n rings over Q. And Bhargava also implicitly relied on a much stronger canonicity (over Z) in structuring his Higher Composition Laws [9, 10, 11, 14]. Perhaps the place where the idea of using such canonical multiplicative structures was first developed was in Deligne’s letter to Bhargava [41] which inspired Wood’s vast generalization in her thesis [114, 113, 112] extending Bhargava’s quadratic, cubic, and quartic Higher Composition Laws to arbitrary base schemes.

Where can I find a copy of this letter (or a short explanation of the idea)? Thank you very much.