Timeline for Ultraproducts of finite cyclic groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014 at 14:41 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | @Keiwan--nice! (clean :-) | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:27 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | I guess I was in a hurry, too, when I wrote "question" for "answer". | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:17 | history | edited | Keivan Karai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:06 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=6976 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:05 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=6976 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:05 | |||||
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:05 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=6976 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 12:05 | |||||
| Aug 31, 2010 at 11:42 | comment | added | Keivan Karai | Sorry Tom, I think we started to edit almost at the same time! | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 11:41 | comment | added | Keivan Karai | Sorry, I was in a run, so the proof was not clear. I just rewrote it. | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 11:40 | history | edited | Keivan Karai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 390 characters in body
|
| Aug 31, 2010 at 11:36 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | I have just edited the question for clarity. I had seen this argument before, but I had forgotten it. Note that it actually implies that the dual of the product is the sum. | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 11:32 | history | edited | Tom Goodwillie | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 50 characters in body; added 3 characters in body
|
| Aug 31, 2010 at 10:53 | comment | added | Stefan Geschke | Why can you assume that $x$ is of the form $(a_0,2a_1,4a_2,\dots)$? | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 10:47 | history | answered | Keivan Karai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |