Skip to main content
added 249 characters in body
Source Link
Ben Ciotti
  • 401
  • 2
  • 7

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1(\Omega)$ refers to functions which are continuously differentiable in $\Omega$ and extend continuously to $0$ on $\partial\Omega$).

  • Assumption A: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1(\Omega)$ refers to functions which are continuously differentiable in $\Omega$ and extend continuously to $0$ on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can Iwe show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if Iwe include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption AB: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption BC: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption CD: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption CD more or less implies Assumption AB. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Notation: Here $H^k$ is the standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{k,2}$.

9/14/20 Edit:
Question 1 has been answered in the affirmative. I additionally pose the following

Question 3: Answer Questions 1 and 2 in the case that Assumption A is replaced by

  • Assumption A': $f\in L^1_{\text{loc}}(\Omega)$.

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1(\Omega)$ refers to functions which are continuously differentiable in $\Omega$ and extend continuously to $0$ on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Notation: Here $H^k$ is the standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{k,2}$.

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies

  • Assumption A: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1(\Omega)$ refers to functions which are continuously differentiable in $\Omega$ and extend continuously to $0$ on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can we show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if we include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption B: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption D: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption D more or less implies Assumption B. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Notation: Here $H^k$ is the standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{k,2}$.

9/14/20 Edit:
Question 1 has been answered in the affirmative. I additionally pose the following

Question 3: Answer Questions 1 and 2 in the case that Assumption A is replaced by

  • Assumption A': $f\in L^1_{\text{loc}}(\Omega)$.
Became Hot Network Question
added 49 characters in body
Source Link
Ben Ciotti
  • 401
  • 2
  • 7

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1$$C_0^1(\Omega)$ refers to continuously differentiable functions which are 0continuously differentiable in $\Omega$ and extend continuously to $0$ on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ (here $H^1$ is standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{1,2}$) and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Notation: Here $H^k$ is the standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{k,2}$.

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1$ refers to continuously differentiable functions which are 0 on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ (here $H^1$ is standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{1,2}$) and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1(\Omega)$ refers to functions which are continuously differentiable in $\Omega$ and extend continuously to $0$ on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Notation: Here $H^k$ is the standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{k,2}$.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
Ben Ciotti
  • 401
  • 2
  • 7

Showing integrability of a locally integrable function is integrableon a bounded domain under some additional assumptions

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1$ refers to continuously differentiable functions which are 0 on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include any, some, or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ (here $H^1$ is standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{1,2}$) and $f=\ln h$$f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Showing a locally integrable function is integrable under some additional assumptions

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1$ refers to continuously differentiable functions which are 0 on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include any, some, or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ (here $H^1$ is standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{1,2}$) and $f=\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Showing integrability of a locally integrable function on a bounded domain under some additional assumptions

Suppose $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth and bounded domain, and $f:\Omega\to[0,\infty]$ is a given function which is finite almost everywhere and satisfies the following: For all $g\in C_0^1(\Omega)$ we have the product $fg\in L^1(\Omega)$. (Here $C_0^1$ refers to continuously differentiable functions which are 0 on $\partial\Omega$).

Question 1: Can I show that $f\in L^1(\Omega)$?

Question 2: Does the answer to Question 1 change if I include some or all of the following assumptions:

  • Assumption A: $f$ possesses a weak derivative which is finite almost everywhere in $\Omega$;

  • Assumption B: There exists a nonnegative function $f_0 \in H^2(\Omega)\cap C(\bar{\Omega})$ such that $f-f_0=0$ (in the sense of trace) on $\partial\Omega$;

  • Assumption C: There exists a nonnegative function $h\in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $h$ is nonzero almost everywhere in $\Omega$ (here $H^1$ is standard Sobolev space notation for $W^{1,2}$) and $f=-\ln h$ in $\Omega$.

Note: Assumption C more or less implies Assumption A. I wrote them separately in the hopes of formulating the problem as simply as possible.

Source Link
Ben Ciotti
  • 401
  • 2
  • 7
Loading