Timeline for Why aren't representations of monoids studied so much?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2019 at 16:15 | answer | added | Tim Campion | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 23:09 | answer | added | math137 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 4, 2014 at 15:28 | answer | added | Hans | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 29, 2011 at 4:03 | answer | added | Boris Novikov | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 22, 2011 at 3:19 | answer | added | Benjamin Steinberg | timeline score: 68 | |
| Dec 29, 2010 at 14:15 | comment | added | arsmath | I recommend looking at the paper that Jianrong Li linked to (arxiv.org/abs/0712.2076). I would have said that there's nothing special about representations of finite semigroups versus arbitrary finite-dimensional algebras, but the paper gives a description of the irreducible representations purely in terms of the structure of the semigroup. | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 4:37 | answer | added | Allen Knutson | timeline score: 87 | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 6:59 | answer | added | user6976 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 17:42 | answer | added | Richard Borcherds | timeline score: 31 | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 16:44 | answer | added | tgh | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 15:54 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 55 | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 13:21 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 29 | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 4:56 | vote | accept | Mikola | ||
| Aug 30, 2010 at 4:50 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 76 | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 4:35 | comment | added | David Corwin | This book, especially its introduction and references, seems pretty relevant: amazon.com/… | |
| Aug 30, 2010 at 4:29 | history | asked | Mikola | CC BY-SA 2.5 |