Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 3, 2020 at 5:07 comment added Emily @RoaldKoudenburg Hmm... I think the paper answers a different question, which is related to this one. Namely, referring to the very first diagram in p. 2 there, I think my question would correspond to taking $F=\mathrm{id}$ and studying when the induced morphism between co/limits is an iso. From what I understand, however, Paré is studying what would be necessary to have a morphism, not necessarily an iso, between the co/limits. In any case, the paper looks very interesting! Thanks for the pointer :)
Sep 2, 2020 at 17:44 comment added Roald Koudenburg Robert Paré's Morphisms of colimits might be relevant?
Aug 31, 2020 at 7:34 comment added Zhen Lin I doubt it. If anything it may be more important to look at the diagram shape $\mathcal{C}$. For instance, if $\mathcal{C}$ has a cofinal full subcategory then you know that the components of the diagram outside that subcategory don't matter.
Aug 31, 2020 at 5:51 comment added Emily @ZhenLin Thanks! If we impose nice conditions on $\mathcal{D}$ (say being a topos or the category of models of a finite limits theory, etc.), then would “cofinal natural transformations” admit useful characterisations?
Aug 31, 2020 at 1:53 comment added Zhen Lin This is a right orthogonality condition. As such it is closed under composition and retracts and limits and has the 2-out-of-6 property. If $\mathcal{D}$ is, say, accessible then you only need to check the condition against a small set of objects. I don’t think there’s much more that can be said in this generality, since it depends on $\mathcal{D}$, unlike cofinality of functors.
Aug 30, 2020 at 23:16 history edited Emily CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Aug 30, 2020 at 23:07 history edited Emily CC BY-SA 4.0
added 18 characters in body
Aug 30, 2020 at 22:59 history asked Emily CC BY-SA 4.0