Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 19, 2020 at 7:35 comment added Mikael de la Salle ... on the other hand, if you make the additional assumption that the $L^\infty \to L^\infty$ norm of $A$ is $\leq 1$, by interpolation and Hoelder you get the bound $|\frac{1}{X} \sum_x \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} A^i f(x) | \leq \epsilon^{2n-3}$. Same bound for $n=3$, but better for $n>3$ in the regime $\log X>>-\log \epsilon$.
Aug 18, 2020 at 21:50 comment added Will Sawin So in this normalization the inequality is $||fg||_2 \leq \sqrt{X} ||f||_2 ||g||_2$ and we can get a bound of $|\sum_{x \in X} \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} A^i f(x) | \leq X ||\prod_{i=0}^{n-2} A^i f ||_2 ||A^{n-1} f ||_2 \ll X ||\prod_{i=1}^{n-2} A^i f ||_2 ||A^{n-1} f ||_2 \leq X^{1 + \frac{n-3}{2}} \prod_{i=1}^{n-1} || A^i f||_2 \leq X^{ \frac{n-1}{2}} \epsilon^{ n (n-1)/2}$ which, if I calculated correctly, my counterexample shows is sharp to within a constant factor.
Aug 18, 2020 at 11:31 comment added H A Helfgott Well, I meant to define the inner product with a factor of $1/X$, and then bounded just means bounded.
Aug 18, 2020 at 10:17 comment added Mikael de la Salle Just to be sure, when you write "$|f|_\infty$ is bounded", do you mean that $\sup_{x \in X} |f(x)| \leq C/\sqrt{|X|}$?
Aug 16, 2020 at 23:25 comment added Will Sawin In this setting $f_2,f_3,\dots$ all attain the maximal $L^2$ norm, or close to it, and a positive proportion of their $L^2$ mass is concentrated at the point $0$, so these types of bounds will basically be sharp.
Aug 16, 2020 at 23:25 comment added Will Sawin You can do a little better using the boundedness of $f_1$ to bound some higher norm. The worst case for these simple estimates is when the functions $f_1,f_2,f_3$ are both highly concentrated and highly correlated. I don't see any obstruction to this happening except the boundedness of $f_1$, which is mild. Take $A$ to be an $n\times n$ symmetric matrix where the first row and column are all $\epsilon/\sqrt{|X|}$ except for the first entry which is $\epsilon$, and all other entries are $0$. Take $f_1$ to be the all $1/\sqrt{X}$ vector (or all $1$s depending on normalization).
Aug 16, 2020 at 23:22 comment added Will Sawin @HenrikRüping Why use the $L^2$ - $L^1$ norm estimate and not just multiply in two batches and use Cauchy-Schwarz? If $f_1,f_2, f_3$ have $L_2$ norms at most $a_1,a_2,a_3$ then $\left| \sum_{x \in X} f_1(x)f_2(x) f_3(x) \right| \leq a_1 a_2 a_3$. (But maybe the $L^2$ norm is supposed to be normalized so $X$ has total mass one and not point mass one?)
Aug 16, 2020 at 20:46 comment added Fedor Petrov I would start with writing $A=\sum \lambda_i P_i$ for projectors $P_i$ and changing the order of summation. We get $\sum_{i,j} \lambda_i \lambda_j^2 \sum_x f(x) f_i(x)f_j(x)$ where $f_i(x)=(P_i f)(x)$. Do you see anything more clever than bounding this as $\varepsilon^3 \sum_{i,j}|\sum_x f(x)f_i(x)f_j(x)|$?
Aug 16, 2020 at 20:46 comment added H A Helfgott Ah, well, yes, I was thinking that one might be able to afford factors of $\log X$ or $\log \log X$. A factor of $\sqrt{X}$ is too large.
Aug 16, 2020 at 20:31 comment added HenrikRüping WEll maybe a bit too simple, but we have for pointwise multiplication of functions that $ |f\cdot g|_2 \le |f|_2\cdot |g|_2$, and thus we ould estimate the L_2-Norm of $f \cdot Af\cdot A^2f$ by $\varepsilon^3 |f|_2^3$. And similarly the L_2-norm of $f\cdot Af\cdot A^2 f\cdot A^3f$ by $\varepsilon^6 |f|_2^4$ etc. Then $|f|_1$ and $|f|_2$ differ at most by a factor of $\sqrt{|X|}$.
Aug 16, 2020 at 20:23 comment added H A Helfgott Well, probably, but I'm looking for anything, really. What sort of bound would depend on $|X|$?
Aug 16, 2020 at 20:19 comment added Fedor Petrov You look for bounds which do not depend on $|X|$, yes?
Aug 16, 2020 at 19:02 history edited H A Helfgott CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Aug 16, 2020 at 18:48 history edited H A Helfgott CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Aug 16, 2020 at 6:58 history asked H A Helfgott CC BY-SA 4.0