Timeline for Australian Mathematical Society journal rankings
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2020 at 12:18 | answer | added | Kostya_I | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 18, 2020 at 10:47 | answer | added | Max Menzies | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 15, 2020 at 13:06 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
| Aug 15, 2020 at 1:43 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Aug 14, 2020 at 23:22 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Some additional context : this ranking was done for all (reasonable) journals, at the behest of the Australian Research Council. Mathematicians complained that journal rankings are not as simple as people think and so (I think to shut us up) the AustMS got given the job of doing something reasonable using research community-sourced information. These rankings were for the purpose of 'grading' Australian universities' research output, and the whole exercise was abandoned after a few years (about a decade ago). | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 21:36 | comment | added | anon | Apologies, Alexandre Eremenko. I have accepted an answer since it seems the issue is as resolved as it will be. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 21:36 | vote | accept | anon | ||
| Aug 14, 2020 at 20:51 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | Journal ranking discussion is out of scope of this site. The MO question you refer to is closed, and I voted to close this as well. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 18:41 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 18:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 15, 2020 at 16:38 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2020 at 18:24 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 9 | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 18:00 | comment | added | anon | Thank you R. van Dobben de Bruyn, that is also helpful. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:59 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | The Wayback machine does have an archived version. Besides general legal ambiguity, I think this is supposed to be a somewhat permanent secondary source. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:58 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:57 | comment | added | anon | Thanks. I understand the decision and don't wish to criticize them. The simple hosting of the old list was useful to me and others, and it would be nice to know if it is being scrubbed from the web. But given that, I suppose my question 2 is more salient at this point. I appreciate it. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:54 | comment | added | Will Sawin | The article theconversation.com/… linked in the previous question seems to answer that this has been disavowed as out of date, and won't be replaced in any kind of similar form. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:52 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:55 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2020 at 17:43 | history | asked | anon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |