Skip to main content
removed capitals from title, formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Exponential Mapmap of Moduli Spacemoduli space

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$$\mathbb{C}[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$$\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{an}$$\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ is compact. If we choose a basis of the projective space, we get an induced metric on $\mathcal{M}^{an}$$\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ (thanks to the comments for pointing me to this gap!). By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}^{an}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}^{an}$$T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}^{an}$$\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such a lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

Exponential Map of Moduli Space

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ is compact. If we choose a basis of the projective space, we get an induced metric on $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ (thanks to the comments for pointing me to this gap!). By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}^{an}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}^{an}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}^{an}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

Exponential map of moduli space

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ is compact. If we choose a basis of the projective space, we get an induced metric on $\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ (thanks to the comments for pointing me to this gap!). By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{an}}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of such a lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

added 163 characters in body
Source Link

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ is compact. If we choose a basis of the projective space, we get an induced metric on $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ (thanks to the comments for pointing me to this gap!). By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}$$T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}^{an}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}^{an}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}$$\mathcal{M}^{an}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ is compact. By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ is compact. If we choose a basis of the projective space, we get an induced metric on $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ (thanks to the comments for pointing me to this gap!). By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}^{an}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}^{an}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}^{an}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

added 42 characters in body
Source Link

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a compactprojective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is compactprojective, bythen $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ is compact. By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a compact smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is compact, by Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a projective smooth moduli space over $\mathbb{C}$ (the specific example I have in mind is the moduli of curves $\mathcal{M}_g)$. Consider a point $[X]\in \mathcal{M}(\mathbb{C})$. Then via deformation theory in algebraic geometry, we say that the tangent space $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}$ consists of lifts (or rather isomorphism classes of lifts) of $X$ to $\mathbb{C}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2)$. This is naturally a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space. My question is in two parts:

  1. Does this construction match with the tangent space of the analytification $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ at $X$? (This question doesn't need compact, I think)

  2. Since I assume that $\mathcal{M}$ is projective, then $\mathcal{M}^{an}$ is compact. By Hopf-Rinow, the exponential map $T_{[X]}\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}$ is well-defined (if we assume that $[X]$ does not lie in the boundary of $\mathcal{M}$. If part 1) is true, the tangent space corresponds to infinitesimal lifts of $X$. Can we explicitly say what the image of an such lift is under the exponential map?

If this isn't possible in general, is there perhaps a way to do it for the moduli of curves, moduli of abelian varieties or the Hilbert scheme?

forgot an essential assumption!
Source Link
Loading
added 27 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading