Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 26, 2020 at 2:36 comment added Ptharien's Flame This transformation is also related, by way of propositions-as-types/Curry-Howard, to the DeMorgan laws of propositional logics, and for similar reasons to “continuation passing”.
Jul 25, 2020 at 14:18 comment added Paul Taylor $D Y$ above should of course have been $T Y$. Also, Kock wrote $[X\pitchfork Y]$ for the internal hom more recognisably called $[X\to Y]$.
Jul 25, 2020 at 13:19 comment added Paul Taylor That is the version of "strength" that is commonly seen in the CS literature, especially since Eugenio Moggi's work. Kock investigated other forms, of which I suspect the original one was that the action of the functor on hom-sets $T:C(X,Y)\to D(T X,D Y)$ extends to internal homs $[X\to Y]\to[T X\to T Y]$ or $Y^X\to (T Y)^{(T X)}$. Kock did this for monoidal-closed categories; it's hardly worth mentioning for CCCs. His webpage is users-math.au.dk/kock
Jul 25, 2020 at 10:07 comment added goblin GONE @PaulTaylor, honestly I don't quite see the connection with functorial strengths. As I understand it, a strength allows you to take something outside a functor's arguments, and put it inside the arguments. Like so: $X \times FY \rightarrow F(X \times Y)$. But I can't really see the connection to what I'm asking....
Jul 25, 2020 at 8:43 comment added Paul Taylor This looks like one of the many manifestations of "strength" of a functor, which was first investigated by Anders Kock. As for a name, strong/strength are words that have been vastly over-used already. Look up Kock's work, but just describe your construction as what it does - don't give it a confusing name.
Jul 25, 2020 at 5:46 history edited goblin GONE CC BY-SA 4.0
added 70 characters in body
Jul 25, 2020 at 3:42 history edited goblin GONE CC BY-SA 4.0
added 426 characters in body
Jul 25, 2020 at 3:25 history edited goblin GONE CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 111 characters in body
Jul 25, 2020 at 1:58 history asked goblin GONE CC BY-SA 4.0