Timeline for Should cohomology of $\mathbb{C} P^\infty$ be a polynomial ring or a power series ring?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 25, 2020 at 21:03 | comment | added | D.-C. Cisinski | $R\Gamma(\mathbb{C}P^\infty,\mathbb{Z})\cong R\lim_nR\Gamma(\mathbb{C}P^n\mathbb{Z})$ by descent. We have $R\Gamma(\mathbb{C}P^\infty,\mathbb{Z})\cong\prod_{n\geq 0}\mathbb{Z}[2n]$ from the theory of Chern classes, and then $\bigoplus_{n\geq 0}\mathbb{Z}[2n]\cong\prod_{n\geq 0}\mathbb{Z}[2n]$ for formal reasons in the derived category of abelian groups. The power series formulation is more natural from a sheaf theoretic perspective, but, in the derived category, $R\Gamma(\mathbb{C}P^\infty,\mathbb{Z})$ is both a polynomial ring and ring of power series. | |
Jul 25, 2020 at 18:00 | comment | added | Lennart Meier | If you want to have all degrees in one degree, you can build either the cohomology theory sending $X$ to $\bigoplus_{i\in \mathbb{Z}}H^i(X)$ in every degree or to $\prod_{i\in \mathbb{Z}}H^i(X)$. The first is not represented by a spectrum as it does not satisfy the wedge axiom, while the second one is. | |
Jul 24, 2020 at 23:56 | comment | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | To avoid confusion I write $H^*$ when I think of cohomology as a direct sum and $H^{**}$ when I think of it as a direct product. | |
Jul 24, 2020 at 17:47 | history | edited | PowerToThePeople | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1117 characters in body
|
Jul 24, 2020 at 17:26 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 24, 2020 at 17:27 | |||||
Jul 24, 2020 at 17:25 | answer | added | Denis Nardin | timeline score: 13 | |
Jul 24, 2020 at 17:20 | history | asked | PowerToThePeople | CC BY-SA 4.0 |