Timeline for Rowmotion for general lattices
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2020 at 8:08 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
MathJax: \min
|
| S Jul 25, 2020 at 7:41 | history | suggested | Mark Schultz-Wu |
wrong lattice tag used
|
|
| Jul 25, 2020 at 7:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 25, 2020 at 7:41 | |||||
| Jul 24, 2020 at 15:28 | history | edited | Mare | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 67 characters in body
|
| Jul 24, 2020 at 14:49 | comment | added | Mare | @SamHopkins Ok, thank you. I will try to read the article in detail now. My expierence with non-distributive lattices is very small. Rowmotion recently came up naturally in a homological algebra problem, and it seems the construction works if and only if the lattice is distributive. | |
| Jul 24, 2020 at 14:45 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | Regarding your last comment from the edit, you should definitely look at the semidistributive case. | |
| Jul 24, 2020 at 14:39 | history | edited | Mare | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 91 characters in body
|
| Jul 24, 2020 at 13:36 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | I think the paper you linked to before (arxiv.org/abs/1712.10123v2) explains this, especially when discussing the work of Barnard (arxiv.org/abs/1610.05137) in Section 6. In fact you might be interested in the semi-distributive case, where a lot can be said. | |
| Jul 24, 2020 at 10:33 | history | asked | Mare | CC BY-SA 4.0 |