Timeline for Does $\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathbb{C}(t)\cong\mathcal{D}\otimes\mathbb{C}(t)$ imply an isomorphism of Lie algebras?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 24, 2020 at 6:58 | vote | accept | solver6 | ||
Jul 23, 2020 at 16:49 | comment | added | Joshua Mundinger | @მამუკაჯიბლაძე the $t$-adic topology on $K((t))$ doesn't play well with embedding into $\mathbb C$. | |
Jul 23, 2020 at 10:38 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | I wonder why a similar argument would not work with $\mathbb C((t))$... | |
Jul 23, 2020 at 10:09 | comment | added | solver6 | So you proved the more general fact that if $\mathcal{A}\otimes_{\mathbb{C}}\mathbb{C}(t)$ is isomorphic as $\mathbb{C}(t)$-Lie algebra to $\mathcal{B}\otimes_{\mathbb{C}}\mathbb{C}(t)$ and $\dim_{\mathbb{C}}\mathcal{A}=\dim_{\mathbb{C}}\mathcal{B}$-countable then $\mathcal{A}$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal{B}$ as $\mathbb{C}$-Lie algebra. Is there any known reference to this fact existed in literature? | |
Jul 23, 2020 at 10:00 | history | edited | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified the meaning of "structure constants"
|
Jul 23, 2020 at 10:00 | comment | added | solver6 | If by structure constants you mean coordinates of commutators of elements from a countable basis then it looks as a correct proof for me. I need to think more about it to mark as accepted | |
Jul 23, 2020 at 9:52 | comment | added | solver6 | Thank you. I don't have enough knowledge about structure constants, so right now I cannot check your proof completely. From the answer we have that 1), 2) are true, but what about 3)? | |
Jul 23, 2020 at 9:04 | history | answered | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 4.0 |