Timeline for What are the benefits of writing vector inner products as $\langle u, v\rangle$ as opposed to $u^T v$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2020 at 20:25 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| S Jul 21, 2020 at 19:16 | history | suggested | Chetan Vuppulury | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected C^n to \mathbb C^n
|
| Jul 21, 2020 at 18:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 21, 2020 at 19:16 | |||||
| Jul 21, 2020 at 11:59 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Jul 21, 2020 at 3:05 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | YES. This is absolutely the correct answer. | |
| Jul 21, 2020 at 0:39 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @LSpice: well, restrict yourself to the real and complex field. You still have plenty of spaces and plenty of different dot products on each. | |
| Jul 20, 2020 at 23:09 | comment | added | LSpice | Surely vector spaces over an arbitrary field $k$ is too general; how do you define positive definiteness? This seems more like the generality for symmetric or conjugate-symmetric forms. | |
| Jul 20, 2020 at 22:17 | comment | added | Nathaniel Johnston | Just a minor note: $A$ has to be positive definite, not just Hermitian, for that to be an inner product. | |
| Jul 20, 2020 at 22:09 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| Jul 20, 2020 at 12:27 | history | answered | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |