Timeline for Interpretation around conjugacy classes in group theory [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2020 at 18:17 | vote | accept | R. Srivastava | ||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 14:40 | history | closed |
YCor LeechLattice HenrikRüping M. Winter Derek Holt |
Not suitable for this site | |
| S Jul 20, 2020 at 14:30 | history | suggested | Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda |
Not part of algebraic geometry.
|
|
| Jul 20, 2020 at 13:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 20, 2020 at 14:30 | |||||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 12:21 | answer | added | Claus | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 20, 2020 at 12:19 | history | edited | R. Srivastava | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jul 20, 2020 at 8:30 | history | edited | R. Srivastava | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 139 characters in body
|
| Jul 20, 2020 at 8:19 | comment | added | Claus | @R. Srivastava Rajeev welcome to MO. Maybe best if you specify where you have read this. This might make it easier to give you an answer | |
| Jul 20, 2020 at 8:07 | comment | added | HenrikRüping | I would read the informal sentence "cannot be distinguished by only using the group structure" as that there is a group isomorphism $G\rightarrow G$ sending one element to the other. That isomorphism sending $x$ to $gxg^{-1}$ is given by conjugation with $g$. Certainly a set invariant under conjugation spans a normal subgroup. Certainly conjugacy classes are not subgroups themselves, they don't need to contain the neutral element. | |
| Jul 20, 2020 at 7:32 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 14:48 | |||||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 7:19 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 7:38 | |||||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 7:13 | history | asked | R. Srivastava | CC BY-SA 4.0 |