Skip to main content
added 108 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

I have not found a source where Thomas Zink explains the name, however arXiv:1906.00899 explains it as an abbreviation of “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or $3n$-) displays. See also Travaux de Zink, page 343.

I have not found a source where Thomas Zink explains the name, however arXiv:1906.00899 explains it as an abbreviation of “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or $3n$-) displays.

I have not found a source where Thomas Zink explains the name, however arXiv:1906.00899 explains it as an abbreviation of “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or $3n$-) displays. See also Travaux de Zink, page 343.

added 68 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

They are called “not-necessarily-nilpotent”I have not found a source where Thomas Zink explains the name, however arXiv:1906.00899 explains it as an abbreviation of “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or 3n$3n$-) displays.

[source, page 11]

They are called “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or 3n-) displays.

[source, page 11]

I have not found a source where Thomas Zink explains the name, however arXiv:1906.00899 explains it as an abbreviation of “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or $3n$-) displays.

Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

They are called “not-necessarily-nilpotent” (or 3n-) displays.

[source, page 11]