Skip to main content
Spelling of Jarchow corrected
Source Link
Jochen Wengenroth
  • 16.5k
  • 2
  • 42
  • 82

This is always true (without nuclearity): If $T_j:E_j\to F_j$ are continuous linear maps between Hausdorff locally convex spaces and $E_2$ is complete then $$ T_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon T_2: E_1 \hat\otimes_\varepsilon E_2 \to F_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon F_2$$ is injective if so are $T_1$ and $T_2$. This is 16.2.2 in Jarchos'sJarchows's book Locally Convex Spaces.

This is always true (without nuclearity): If $T_j:E_j\to F_j$ are continuous linear maps between Hausdorff locally convex spaces and $E_2$ is complete then $$ T_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon T_2: E_1 \hat\otimes_\varepsilon E_2 \to F_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon F_2$$ is injective if so are $T_1$ and $T_2$. This is 16.2.2 in Jarchos's book Locally Convex Spaces.

This is always true (without nuclearity): If $T_j:E_j\to F_j$ are continuous linear maps between Hausdorff locally convex spaces and $E_2$ is complete then $$ T_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon T_2: E_1 \hat\otimes_\varepsilon E_2 \to F_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon F_2$$ is injective if so are $T_1$ and $T_2$. This is 16.2.2 in Jarchows's book Locally Convex Spaces.

Source Link
Jochen Wengenroth
  • 16.5k
  • 2
  • 42
  • 82

This is always true (without nuclearity): If $T_j:E_j\to F_j$ are continuous linear maps between Hausdorff locally convex spaces and $E_2$ is complete then $$ T_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon T_2: E_1 \hat\otimes_\varepsilon E_2 \to F_1\hat\otimes_\varepsilon F_2$$ is injective if so are $T_1$ and $T_2$. This is 16.2.2 in Jarchos's book Locally Convex Spaces.