Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 1, 2020 at 4:31 vote accept Mikhail Borovoi
Jun 30, 2020 at 20:25 history became hot network question
Jun 30, 2020 at 17:10 comment added Mikhail Borovoi @YCor: You are right. We need real structures (anti-linear involutions). However, conjugacy classes of of real structures bijectively correspond to conjugacy classes of $\Bbb C$-linear involutions. See page 442 of Helgason's book, or Serre, Cohomologie galoisienne, III.4.5, Theorem 6 and Example (b). Helgason writes that Cartan discovered this later, in 1929.
Jun 30, 2020 at 15:19 answer added Francois Ziegler timeline score: 9
Jun 30, 2020 at 14:22 comment added YCor About Q3: scholar.google.fr/… can always help.
Jun 30, 2020 at 14:20 comment added YCor Why are you asking about $\mathbf{C}$-linear involutions? doesn't the topic of the paper suggest that it classifies $\mathbf{C}$-skew-linear involution? In any case it is never explicit (the paper doesn't mention automorphisms). And all along it makes this classification, which is equivalent to classifying those skew-linear involutions (more than half of the paper is about exceptional cases EFG). I don't think it gives any information on linear involutions.
Jun 30, 2020 at 14:11 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
removed unnecessary word in title
Jun 30, 2020 at 12:40 answer added Piotr Hajlasz timeline score: 3
Jun 30, 2020 at 12:24 comment added Mikhail Borovoi I do read French. However, it is hard to read a paper on Lie groups or Lie algebras written before Dynkin: the language has changed completely!
Jun 30, 2020 at 12:22 history asked Mikhail Borovoi CC BY-SA 4.0