Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 6, 2020 at 14:15 vote accept tituf
Jul 5, 2020 at 12:10 history bounty ended tituf
Jul 3, 2020 at 19:06 comment added Piero D'Ancona Maybe, but I do not see how to use this extra freedom
Jul 2, 2020 at 21:59 comment added tituf If $U$ is allowed to depend on $\alpha$, is everything easier?
Jul 2, 2020 at 18:22 comment added Piero D'Ancona You could try with a multiplier of the form $\phi(x,V)$. The derivatives w.r.to $x$ should be of lower order, that is, small compared to the main terms. For instance of polynomial growth in $x$
Jul 2, 2020 at 17:23 comment added tituf If I weaken the request and ask the inequality to hold only for $0<\alpha<\alpha_0$, then $\Delta V\leq \theta |\nabla V|^2$ for some $\theta<\alpha_0^{-1}$ is a sufficient hypothesis. This can be seen by choosing $U=V$. Do you see any further possibility when only $0<\alpha<\alpha_0$ is considered?
Jul 1, 2020 at 21:46 comment added Piero D'Ancona It seems difficult, since you want your inequality to hold for arbitrarily large $\alpha$, but I can not exclude it
Jul 1, 2020 at 15:40 comment added tituf Thank you for your answer. Taking $U=\phi(V)$ is great, but is it possible to weaken the hypothesis on $V$, for example $\Delta V \leq \theta |\nabla V|^2$ for some fixed $\theta$?
Jun 30, 2020 at 18:01 history edited Piero D'Ancona CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jun 30, 2020 at 8:13 history undeleted Piero D'Ancona
Jun 30, 2020 at 8:13 history edited Piero D'Ancona CC BY-SA 4.0
added 140 characters in body
Jun 30, 2020 at 8:07 history deleted Piero D'Ancona via Vote
Jun 30, 2020 at 8:04 history answered Piero D'Ancona CC BY-SA 4.0