Timeline for Notation for induced subgraphs
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2020 at 8:16 | comment | added | M. Winter | I myself would probably use $G-\{v,w\}$ as I always avoid revealing the implementation of my edges as sets, that is, I never state that $e=\{v,w\}$. And then $G-S$ is equally well defined for any set $S$ of vertices. | |
| Jun 29, 2020 at 4:40 | comment | added | Brendan McKay | As bof said, definitely do not used $G-e$ as that is extremely widespread as meaning that only the edge is removed and not its end-vertices. | |
| Jun 28, 2020 at 23:16 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | Once I used $G-[e]$; page 38 here: arxiv.org/abs/1812.06627 | |
| Jun 28, 2020 at 23:15 | comment | added | bof | Isn't $G-e$ used for the spanning subgraph where only the edge is deleted and the vertices remain? How about $G-u-v$? | |
| Jun 28, 2020 at 23:00 | history | asked | James Propp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |