Skip to main content
added 96 characters in body
Source Link

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f$ which agrees with $1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ on $[-1,1]$ and then decays very fast to zero to become a compactly supported continuous function, is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous? For my purpose if one such $f$ exists for which the Fourier transform is integrable is enough?

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f$ which agrees with $1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ on $[-1,1]$ and then decays very fast to zero to become a compactly supported continuous function, is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous?

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f$ which agrees with $1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ on $[-1,1]$ and then decays very fast to zero to become a compactly supported continuous function, is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous? For my purpose if one such $f$ exists for which the Fourier transform is integrable is enough?

added 104 characters in body
Source Link

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f(x)=1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$$f$ which agrees with $1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ on $[-1,1]$ and then decays very fast to zero to become a compactly supported continuous function, is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous?

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f(x)=1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous?

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f$ which agrees with $1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ on $[-1,1]$ and then decays very fast to zero to become a compactly supported continuous function, is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous?

Source Link

Integrability of Fourier transform of truncated fractional power

Is the Fourier transform of the function $f(x)=1_{[-1.1]}|x|^\alpha$ is in $L^1(\mathbb R)$, where $\alpha\in(1,2)$? My guess is that the answer is true. If I can show that the identity $\widehat{D^\alpha f}(\zeta)=(2\pi i\zeta)^\alpha\hat{f}(\zeta)$ holds in some sense and we have $D^\alpha(1_{[-1,1]}|x|^\alpha)=\alpha!|x|1_{[-1,1]}$ in some sense. Then $\hat{f}$ would have enough decay at infinity to make it in $L^1(\mathbb R)?$ May be fractional derivatives and their interaction with the Fourier transform might be helpful. But I could not find any good reference (easily readable) which can make the above argument rigorous?