Timeline for On a quasi-separated assumption in a lemma for the homotopy exact sequence of the etale fundamental group
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2020 at 20:00 | vote | accept | KReiser | ||
| Jun 29, 2020 at 21:20 | history | edited | Niels | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jun 29, 2020 at 11:26 | history | edited | Niels | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 28, 2020 at 23:33 | comment | added | KReiser | Thank you - I think this more or less resolves my issue (I don't need to prove this in the case that $X$ fails to be quasi-separated, and it does seem reasonable to me that it's a minor error in SGA), but I'm going to leave the question open for a bit longer just in case a more definitive answer should happen to come along. | |
| Jun 27, 2020 at 12:35 | history | answered | Niels | CC BY-SA 4.0 |